Based on data from https://fedipact.veganism.social/ it seems that the majority of instances blocks threads.net. I’m sure there’s Lemmy instances with either approach that have slipped through the cracks as the list is a work in progress.

The percentage of users doesn’t correlate to instances as the biggest instance on the Lemmyverse has roughly 3x the users of the second largest, a NSFW instance, 4x the users of the biggest “niché” instance and 5x the users of what I see as the second largest general purpose instance.

  • kersploosh@sh.itjust.works
    331·
    11 months ago

    It’s interesting that Mastodon instances are trending in the opposite direction of Lemmy instances. Most are staying federated with Threads. I wonder if that’s simply indicative of the strong anti-corporate culture on Lemmy, or if there’s more to it.

      • thenexusofprivacy@lemmy.world
        2·
        11 months ago

        Yep. Meta’s convinced him that this is a huge victory for Mastodon – and a good way for him to achieve his goal of getting Mastodon to 100,000,000 users.

    • 🐑🇸 🇭 🇪 🇪 🇵 🇱 🇪🐑@lemmy.worldEnglish
      232·
      11 months ago

      It’s also because Mastodon has a different structure. While Lemmy tries to mimic Reddits structure with individual communities, Mastodon follows Twitters structure as a larger hub more.

      Mastodon, being less “subdivided” therefore can afford federation with such an entity with less risk. Their collective mass being able to offset threads weight more, in comparison to Lemmy where each community has to compete individually with Threads.

    • lemmyvore@feddit.nlEnglish
      81·
      11 months ago

      It’s also interesting that nobody’s asking “how is Threads federating with Mastodon/Lemmy?” All the focus is on the underdog but shouldn’t we pull our heads out of the bubble and give some attention to what the big dog is doing?

  • 1984@lemmy.today
    334·
    11 months ago

    Someone posted this in another thread and the stats are genuinely misleading here. All the super large instances are federating with Meta, with like 90% of the users.

  • garrett@infosec.pubEnglish
    8·
    11 months ago

    With how bad Lemmy federates across other platforms, even those still federating won’t be seen on Threads lol

      • lemmyvore@feddit.nlEnglish
        27·
        11 months ago

        And the crux of the matter:

        Less emotionally, I think it’s unwise to assume that an organization that has…

        • demonstrably and continuously made antisocial and sometimes deadly choices on behalf of billions of human beings and
        • allowed its products to be weaponized by covert state-level operations behind multiple genocides and hundreds (thousands? tens of thousands?) of smaller persecutions, all while
        • ducking meaningful oversight,
        • lying about what they do and know, and
        • treating their core extraction machines as fait-accompli inevitabilities that mustn’t be governed except in patently ineffective ways…

        …will be a good citizen after adopting a new, interoperable technical structure.

    • pistachio@lemmy.ml
      7·
      11 months ago

      This is the way i see the situation:

      Letting meta join the fediverse means they will captivate the general audience and the fediverse will stop growing. Realizing this, it could lead a lot of contributors to the lemmy/mastodon/activitypub projects lose interest, which will slow down development and could eventually lead to the death of the fediverse project.

      This is how it goes:

      People get accustomed to all the content from Meta/Threads

      Meta adds extra features to their website which do not work with other fediverse instances

      People switch from lemmy/mastodon to threads or join threads directly and never ever consider joining the real fediverse.

      The fediverse project either dies down or remains a niche project forever.