So I want to setup a messaging server in my home that works like Telegram or Whatsapp - it should use the local network as we plan on moving around a lot of photos and files between our devices for some projects

What should I use? XMPP? Or Matrix? Or is there something else that’s ideal for local networks?

Thanks!

  • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Then it sounds like Matrix is what you want. It can send files just fine and I use it for that all the time.

    You may want to set up some kind of cleanup for media storage, as the files would stay on the server even after being sent and received, otherwise, slowly filling it up.

    If you have a ton of storage and the files are reasonably small, you might be be fine without that, but look into it, at least.

    • poVoq@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Matrix doesn’t really work without a public domain name and so on. Maybe this will change in the future with their p2p experiments, but right now it is not a good suggestion for a local only solution.

      • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yes it does. You can use it with a local domain. Setting it up would be marginally more tricky, perhaps even easier than a “real” domain, but using it would as simple as ever, on that LAN.

          • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Obviusly. Is there a downside here beyond it only working locally? Is that not exactly what OP needs? Is there a tool that fits better than matrix?

            • poVoq@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Matrix has all sorts of hard-coded or at least default configured stuff that needs a internet connection to phone home to the matrix.org servers. The Element web interface will also have issues working due to CORS protection in the browser.

              Sure it might end up working sufficiently well after some tinkering, but it really isn’t the right tool for this.

              In general the use of a messenger for this is already less than ideal, but a messenger like matrix that is deeply integrated into a federated network and is build on web technology that isn’t ment to be run locally is just a bad idea, sorry to say.

              I wouldn’t even recommend XMPP for it, and that is much more self-contained and doesn’t use webtechnology at all.

              • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I don’t recall matrix-synapse needing to talk to any outside systems, unless you federate, generate url previews, or use integrations?

                And can’t you just self-host element, too? I do.

                • poVoq@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Its not strictly needed but everything is build with that assumption in mind and thus there will be many papercuts.

                  Yes you can self-host Element, but you have to be very careful with the setup to avoid cors issues and I think it will also permanently show a big warning if the connection is not via HTTPS.

                  • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Bottom line, it can work, if matrix is what op wants to go with.

                    As for SLL, without it any browser based thing is going to get you a warning, from the browser itself, at least.