Would they have all still fought against him?

  • RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I mean, he could have just created 200% more resources as well. Or he could have equally redistributed all the resources. The problem he was trying to solve would still eventually happen again, because solving the problem relies on everyone working unselfishly, which is simply not possible when humans are involved.

    • lazylion_ca@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I think he should have cut the pregnancy rate to a third of what it is now. No one would notice. No one would die or be missed. There’d just be a lot less people within fifty years.

      • AngryHumanoid@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        OK while that would be a better idea the thought that no one would notice is laughable. We have detailed pregnancy rate records going back 75 years, an immediate 30% change would definitely raise a lot of red flags.

    • Random Dent@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think he should have made everyone half size. Then they would have only needed half as many resources plus there’s a little tiny, angry Spiderman jumping around.