Researchers want the public to test themselves: https://yourmist.streamlit.app/. Selecting true or false against 20 headlines gives the user a set of scores and a “resilience” ranking that compares them to the wider U.S. population. It takes less than two minutes to complete.

The paper

Edit: the article might be misrepresenting the study and its findings, so it’s worth checking the paper itself. (See @realChem 's comment in the thread).

  • koreth@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Got 20/20, was rewarded with a message, “You’re more resilient to misinformation than 100% of the US population!” and looked for the Fake button because as a member of the US population, that is a mathematical impossibility.

      • XTL@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        100% has a margin of error in millions, or tens of, depending on interpretation.

        • Lvxferre@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          For most purposes, a 5% margin of error is considered acceptable. Since some quick websearch estimates 336M people, if up to ~17M people are informed, you can still claim that 100% is misinformed.

          (But then, if you actually know how many people are informed, your acceptable margin of error falls down considerably.)

    • vaguerant@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Apparently I’m more resilient to misinformation than 100% of the UK population, but I’m not from the UK; I had to lie on the form because they didn’t have my country. Turns out the real fake news was me.