Grayjay - Follow Creators, Not Platforms
grayjay.app
Grayjay is a unique media application that revolutionizes the relationship between content creators and their audience. Our app democratizes the content delivery process, shifting the focus from platforms to creators themselves.

Quick shout-out to Grayjay: An app to watch videos on any platform - reducing the power of individual services. The Software is open-source and can be found here: https://gitlab.futo.org/videostreaming/grayjay

I will test this out for myself and hope someone here finds this useful.

  • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    334·
    1 year ago

    Exactly. Beware of the inevitable enshittification down the line. Once they have the market share, they have no reason not to close their source

    • Piers@beehaw.orgEnglish
      41·
      1 year ago

      Futo (the organisation developing this app) appears to be a tech billionaire (Eron Wolf) firing his money at the tech industry until it stops being so shit.

      This is from the about page on their website:

      Our Three Pledges

      We will never sell out. All FUTO companies and FUTO-funded projects are expected to remain fiercely independent. They will never exacerbate the monopoly problem by selling out to a monopolist.

      We will never abuse our customers. All FUTO companies and FUTO-funded projects are expected to maintain an honest relationship with their customers. Revenue, if it exists, comes from customers paying directly for software and services. “The users are our product” revenue models are strictly prohibited.

      We will always be transparently devoted to making delightful software. All FUTO-funded projects are expected to be open-source or develop a plan to eventually become so. No effort will ever be taken to hide from the people what their computers are doing, to limit how they use them, or to modify their behavior through their software.

      (From: https://futo.org/what-is-futo/)

      What they say and what they will do could of course differ but they do go to great pains to paint themselves as fundamentally opposed to be sort of action you are worried about.

      • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        8·
        1 year ago

        Words are cheap. Google used to write “don’t be evil”. If they are a billionaire, they could easily afford to make this FOSS.

    • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
      1518·
      1 year ago

      I trust Louis Rossman not to do that. He explained the only reason for the current license is to prevent people forking the app and putting it on the Play store with ads

      • sir_reginald@lemmy.world
        232·
        1 year ago

        I trust no one. Just put the code in a permissive license so when you eventually cease developing the app or when you turn into adding anti-features there are community forks.

        • winkerjadams@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
          712·
          1 year ago

          He explained his reasoning in the video. He said a malicious copy of newpipe got forked and uploaded to the play store and he would like to prevent that from happening.

          • sir_reginald@lemmy.world
            214·
            1 year ago

            that’s no excuse at all. This way they are restricting everyone’s freedom.

            Free software, or if you prefer, open source, is based on the principle that everyone can use the code for any purpose (some licenses have copyleft but that just requires you to share your modifications to the code).

            A malicious actor will simply grab this app code anyway, don’t giving a crap about the license and put ads on top. If they are a malicious actor after all, I highly doubt the license will stop them.

            What the license is stopping are legitimate community forks. There’s a fork of Newpipe that adds Sponsorblock support, for example, which comes super handy. If community forks weren’t allowed, it wouldn’t be possible at all.

            • dnu@lemmy.sdf.org
              98·
              1 year ago

              Having a license allows them to go after the malicious actor with legal backing.

      • Espi@lemmy.world
        91·
        1 year ago

        They should allow that. With gpl, the name is protected and that’s all that matters.