• DreamButt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m glad you enjoy it. If you find the blog to not fit within your world experience no one is saying you need to take it otherwise. However the author’s take did resonate with me

    The “problem” (as you put it) is that people get emotionally invested in their language of choice. Instead of just accepting that there will always be as many languages (and styles of language) as there are types of people

    Rust is great! I’m glad people like it. But for me it will always be painful and that slows me down. A slow developer is a hungry developer

    People can like different things y’all

    • robinm@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I can totally understand the iterating speed due to higher cognitive load of a statically typed language, and non instant compilation.

      However I am very surprised about your refactoring experience. For me Rust is at least in a league of its own. In python/js I am terrified that I could break some unknown parts of my code whenever I touch anything. In C++ I fear that I just broke an invariants and made something UB. In all those languages, I expect regressions when I’m refactoring. But in Rust, even for large scale architecture changes if it compiles I’m quite certain that it’s going to be easy to validate and often works the first try. What point points do you enconter that make your experience sub-optimal ?