That massive spike of 50c/kWh at the left looks tiny compared to today even though that’s already insanely expensive

    • Linssiili@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Well, here (in middle of finland) the sun set at 14:30, so there wasn’t all that much solar energy available.

      Also heat pumps are always at least as efficient as straight electric heating.

    • DanglingFury@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Solar is quite poor in Northern winters. Wind + solar + heat would be a better bet, but the battery required to heat your house for more than a day with low winds would be prohibitively expensive unless you added geothermal to the mix like a geothermal heatpump which is also very expensive. Betweem the gear, battery, geothermal, all installed your probably in the 80k$ range or more. A wood stove would be the best bet

      • 018118055@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        Finland has about 5.2GW of wind capacity vs 4.3 nuclear. If it’s a windy day the spot price will usually be low.

        • DanglingFury@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          Good point, for aome reason i was thinking more off-grid than load balancing economics. The battery would probably help lower power by filling when power is cheap and supplying when the rates spike throughout the day