Shots fired 🔥

    • kadotux@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      There’s a line “Insecure website warning” and it says firefox doesn’t have it. My firefox always displays a warning when opening a http site. edit: Isn’t https-only enabled by default?

      • Political Custard@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        Sorry, I don’t use Firefox so I cannot check what the default is at the moment. I have Librefox and Mullvad Broswer and https is on by default and they both have a green tick on this test.

      • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Off the top of my head https-only is an available setting but is not enabled by default. Although “insecure website warning” would suggest to me that the certificate is expired or invalid, and Firefox is usually the easiest web browser to push past a self-signed certificate warning for local services

      • Political Custard@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        It’s in the “Fingerprinting resistance tests” section so it would be one of the ways of preventing a browser from being uniquely identified by various reported variables, screen height, width etc. It’s worth taking a look at this site that someone else here mentioned to see what information your browser is giving up about itself: https://www.amiunique.org/

        • Aatube@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Sure, you can get fingerprinted if you have a unique window size, but do you really want to disable that at the cost of disabling all responsive websites?

          • Political Custard@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            I am using Librewolf and Mullvad Browser as daily drivers, both of which pass the fingerprinting resistance tests, and the only problem I have experienced was with Twitch and that was solved by changing the user agent.

            • Aatube@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              That’s not what I mean by responsive. Look at the first image in the article, and now resize the window. By disabling media queries, that probably doesn’t happen anymore.

              • Political Custard@lemmygrad.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                That image is responsive on both my browsers. I used the Twitch example only to make the point that that was the only problem I’d experienced, not that it was necessarily related to responsiveness.

                • Aatube@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  Saying that “that image is responsive” confuses me. Do you mean the resized website behaves like the image?

      • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        The browser window size is an easy way to fingerprint. You might be the only person viewing web content in a 1916x988 window who also has a certain font installed.

        • Aatube@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          Yes, but that probably also prevents websites from adapting to your window size better.

          • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            So, I haven’t done any html or css since around when the mobile web was in its infancy but by my understanding responsive websites don’t need to know the exact screen resolution to be responsive. You anchor elements to certain parts of other elements and some are anchored to certain regions of the screen and change the arrangement if there’s not enough space to fit them all on that axis

            • Aatube@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              For layouts that change quite a bit, that sounds like quite a hassle compared to if screen small arrange like dis.