I’ve come across Red Hat allot lately and am wondering if I need to get studying. I’m an avid Ubuntu server user but don’t want to get stuck only knowing one distro. What is the way to go if i want to know as much as I can for use in real world situations.

  • Bogasse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m surprised to see arch on your list, I know everything runs in containers now but arch seems way too unstable O_o

    By unstable I don’t mean “buggy”, but “you will have to adapt to new major version of package XXX or you can’t fetch updates anymore, so no security patches anymore”.

    • Veraticus@lib.lgbt
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I never ran into this so I don’t really know what you’re talking about

      • dino@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        You are probably not an IT Admin. Never heard about any server being deployed on Arch anywhere.

        • Veraticus@lib.lgbt
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m a devops professional, not IT. I’ve managed thousands of servers both in-cloud and in-datacenter. That includes Arch servers managed via Chef.

          Now you’ve heard about it.

          • dino@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            So whats the point of a unstable bleeding edge Arch server, seriously curious. Also if you are not IT than I don’t know what IT is, lol.

            • Veraticus@lib.lgbt
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I didn’t find it more unstable or bleeding edge than anything else. All upgrades had to be tested and scripted anyway so the process for upgrading stuff was basically the same as any other distro. I honestly never ran into any of the problems people talked about here.

              As for why it was chosen, the person in charge liked it and used it personally.

      • Bogasse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You mean you never received any major package update on arch ? 😛

        More seriously, it depends on what we are talking about, if everything runs in container I agree that it kinda doesn’t matter, you will just have a more up to date kernel, but it is stable enough.

        Other peoples on this thread are talking about actual system dependancies, for example installing a postgres server from official repo. On this example it would require a database migration as soon as a major postgres version is released, which means some downtime and non-scheduled maintainance.

    • rwxdan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      From my experience, the host doesn’t matter when you’re using containers, VMs, or even containers inside VMs for your deployments.

      Having said that, I prefer Debian for a single host just because I don’t have to think about it. Then again, what I’d be running on it won’t specific to Debian.

      Nowadays you hear about “reproducible environments” for a good reason.