I was on the beta testing team and have been using Beeper for a little over two years now.

The convenience of having an application to house all of your chat networks is amazing.

  • fades@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It’s not all bad, you’re right. It’s just that this

    To use Beeper, you must give the app permission to send and receive messages through other chat networks using your account credentials. By definition, this may be less secure than using other chat apps alone, especially encrypted chat apps like Signal.

    Makes me lose interest. I understand the motivation behind it, yes they encrypt e2e but it’s still sacrificing security (or maybe I should say increasing risk)

    Self hosting is a good alternative option!

    • anytimesoon@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      The bridges need to decrypt your messages before encrypting them again to send them to you. This is done in memory, so it’s not impossible for your messages to be read by beeper, but quite difficult.

      That said, self hosting will always be a safer option. It’s just not for everyone

        • Rakn@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Super easy. Especially since this is all under their control. So they could simply write those messages elsewhere if they wanted to. I’m not saying they do, but it’s technically possible and a walk in the park.

          I would generally trust such a company to do it right. But that doesn’t save you when law enforcement and such get involved.