• bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    9 months ago

    People usually call in shots fired. So all they’ve done is create an expensive device that maybe tells them a bit sooner than a concerned citizen.

    • JillyB@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      This is where I disagree. I think a transparent, publicly run system to triangulate gunshots is actually a great idea. As long as the microphones are placed evenly throughout a city, they can instantly let police know where and when a gunshot happened.

      However, with no way to publicly verify the fairness of the a private system, there’s only one way this could go.

      • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        Doesn’t triangulation get fucked up by the presence of buildings? I don’t imagine these give much more precision, even in the ideal situation you describe.

        • Flumpkin@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          I imagine that theoretically you could have algorithms or machine learning to calibrate this. Like make test sounds so you see how the sound diffuses and then filter it out.