• superkret@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Gnome3 is great if you don’t expect it to look and behave like Windows (there’s KDE for that).
      Gnome is meant to be controlled with the keyboard and a touchpad, without having to memorize shortcut combos or complicated gestures.
      And it works perfectly.

      • Hutch@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Whilst gnome 3 wasn’t for we it did have charm and I prefer it over Windows or KDE. I’m using xfce4, and really like Window Maker and CDE, but I get why these wouldn’t work well on ultra wide displays. It’s all personal preference and finding what works, which is part of my love for Linux.

      • Fantasmita@lib.lgbt
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well, if you don’t like customize it with using plugins that break every time that gnome gets an update, gnome 3 could be fine…

        • CreamCake@catgirl.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Fun fact, most extensions don’t even break, they just have a fixed value as a compatibile version… A popular example is, GS connect, it was marked as incompatible with gnome 44, but by editing the compatible version, it worked fine.

        • Nato Boram@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Wish there was a first-party clipboard manager in GNOME so I don’t have to hunt for an extension

        • superkret@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          If you feel like you need lots of plugins, use KDE Plasma instead. It can be customized to work very similar to Gnome3 out of the box, and has a lot more options.

        • 20gramsWrench@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Any pluging you install on gnome is going against what gnome is made for, it’s supposed to be barren of function so as to not overwhelm the user, and reduce the number of bug reports the devs are receiving

          • everett@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            That makes sense, and yet the people who actually use *nix tend to be knowledgeable about features that other DEs provide and miss having at least a few of them in their workflow.

            • 20gramsWrench@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              two schools of though even amongst the nix nerds, some will praise it’s minimalism as “not getting in the way”, though usually minimalism is praise because of it’s low ressource requirements with is certainly not the case of gnome

      • SoNick@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s a good one! Gnome is the Windows 8 of the Linux world, and the devs tend to intentionally break the extension system between major releases. It’s truly baffling how the group that made Gnome 2.x continue to hate most of the Linux userbase so much.