Looking for an alternative to synology photos. I moved over to synology about 3 years ago and am now considering moving out of the synology ecosystem. I’m looking for something that has a decent android app, wifi syncing, shareable albums, all the standard stuff.

Edit: thanks for the many replies, I’ll likely move to nextcloud as I was planning on deploying that anyway as a synology drive replacement. I’ll look into immich as well.

  • huskypenguin@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve tried everything. If you like a modern UI and simplicity, you want immich. The lead dev designs the app specifically so his wife is happy using it, and it shows.

    • DontNoodles@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Does Immich support deduplication of images? I have a large set of old scanned photos that I put on photoprism that has deduplication listed as one of its features. It puts photos in its own database.

      Also, how is the face recognition of Immich when compared to others like photoprism?

      • Verbose2812@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        if they have the same hash the deduplication thing will work. if they are different quality or other stuff no. thare are plans to implement something regarding more advanced deduplication but not anything implemented at the moment.

    • kenbw2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Looks like a polished app but sadly it has issues on my Fennec/Firefox for Android

  • wolre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    Immich is still in relatively active development, but has a great feature set and is the only app that could reasonably replace Google Photos for me. Can recommend!

    • finestnothing@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Moved to immich from Google photos recently, it’s an awesome replacement and the ml stuff works really well actually

        • finestnothing@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Not bad at all, set it to sync the photos on my phone with the app and imported photos I had on a drive previously, I still need to get a download of all of my Google photos that aren’t on my phone though

          • mrjfilippo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            The Google Photos part is the what I’m dreading. But good to see immich improving and being recommended more and more.

  • biscuit@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Nothing beats Google Photos for me, personally.

    So I bought a used Google Pixel 1 (first gen) and use Syncthing to sync my camera roll from my phone to the Pixel 1.

    Google originally advertised the Pixel 1 as having unlimited cloud storage for life, so they have to stick to it. I don’t pay for Google storage but I’ve got at least 500gb stored in Google Photos (including all my RAW photos and my digitised VHS tapes).

    I’ll abuse this system until the Pixel 1 dies and I can’t get another one, then I’ll cry.

  • Artaca@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    I tested all of the top options listed on the FOSS photo galleries list. I settled on Immich, and so as of earlier today I currently have everything from GPhotos in Immich, with my phone backing up to both while I get my off-site backup set up. Immich has two drawbacks I consider minor enough for it to come out ahead, but major enough for it to still fall short of truly competing with GP. First, you can jnky select multiple things by tapping them one by one. No tap, hold, drag on mobile. No shift clicking on PC. Next, they have pretty good face recognition, but you can’t…do anything with it? You can’t set albums to auto add certain faces. You can’t assign those people to contacts and auto share with them.

    • limit@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      For me all I really need in a photos app is reliable backup from my phone to my nas. My wife on the other hand, she takes lots of photos that she likes to organize into albums and share with family, so she’s really the deciding factor, i don’t think she really need the facial recognition, it may be useful but really it’s just being able to make albums, sort by month or year, share content, that kind of stuff.

      • Artaca@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah your camera roll or whatever looks and feels exactly like GP. Albums are still a little lacking. No sorting options (currently limited to oldest at the top, newest all the way at the bottom), no comments. The sharing functionality appears to all be there, at least. The dev is very active on GitHub and Discord, implementing fixes and changes as people bring them up daily. Their entire thing is making a GP replacement their own wife is happy with. Future seems bright for it, but it isn’t quite there yet…yet! Lol

  • DeltaTangoLima@reddrefuge.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Jist moved from Photoprism to Immich. Glad i did. Mich better feature set, active development, and multi-user capability isn’t locked behind a paid subscription.

  • merthyr1831@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Nextcloud but that’s just because it happens to have photos on it. I’ve not got an alternative to Google photos yet (And I’m halfway through my bloody storage!)

    • tko@tkohhh.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I really think there’s nothing better than Photostructure in terms of viewing and re-discovering your photos. It’s still a young product going through growing pains, but the things it does, it does well.

      • dan@upvote.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        The deduping is very good, too.

        I’ve been meaning to spend some time setting up PhotoStructure last year, but never got around to it. I tried it on my desktop PC but want to install it on a server. Eventually :)

  • eroc1990@lemmy.parastor.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Been backing up to NextCloud using PhotoSync on iOS and Android the last few years. I also recently implemented Immich, and although that means doubled up photo backup, it’s nice to test out and witness firsthand just how much Immich is improving with every release.

    • peregus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m using NC too with the Memory app and not Immich. You that are using both what do you think? Do you think that one is better than the other?

    • limit@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Do you feel immich is mature enough to be a primary photos app? I may go the route of nextcloud as I’m planning to migrate to nextcloud from synology drive. Didn’t realize they had a photos backup app ad well.

      • Chewy@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        From immich.app:

        The project is under very active development. Expect bugs and changes. Do not use it as the only way to store your photos and videos!

        • limit@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          If you own a domain name you can use DNS challenge for obtaining the ssl cert, no need to open ports to get a cert issued. Nginx proxy manager has this feature built in and has support for many DNS name registrars.

    • fraksken@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Like the peer comment mentioned. just drop nginx in front and let it so the TLS handoff. always recommend to put nginx in front of any open source docker project as you can finetune many of the security controls there.

      • 486@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Getting certs from Let’s Encrypt should work fine with any provider, even if you can’t open any ports, since they do support DNS challenge.

        • dan@upvote.au
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It definitely does. I have some internal-only sites that use Let’s Encrypt certificates. I use acme-dns and Certbot.