• MotoAsh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    It’s not a zero sum game, but there are not an infinite number of eyeballs looking nor is there an infinite supply of content at any given time. If the majority of “art” floating to the top is generated, it will change how people view the platform.

    Maybe the AI “art” community being the first to thrive will mean actual artists get a bad first impression and avoid Lemmy. Maybe people do block it and it becomes a problem only visible to those who don’t already “get it” and just block.

    There are many reasons why it could hurt the community. How do you fail to understand that?

    • imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I never said there aren’t any reasons it could hurt the community. I simply asked what those reasons might be, and you have given me an answer to my question.

      My counterpoint would be that it’s also possible that the increased activity from the AI art community energizes and grows Lemmy as a whole, and some of those users are also interested in other art.

      I think that your beef is with AI art as a concept, not with the Lemmy community in particular. I feel terrible for artists that are losing their livelihood due to AI, but if AI is going to affect my life going forward, I would like to understand how it works and how to deal with it. Observing that Lemmy community has helped to clarify the capabilities and limitations of AI for me personally, along with providing entertainment.

      TLDR verifiable pros > hypothetical cons