• Allero@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Because non-obvious backdoors can be added to the client that break or circumvent encryption (looking at you, xz), stealing all of your passwords, and no one will be able to raise the alarm just by looking at the server code.

    Open-source backend allows to generally avoid this situation, while also potentially rendering you able to self-host if you’re paranoid.

    • refalo@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      and you can control that

      Sorry, I meant “assuming one has complete control over the client source” where the remote cannot just change it on you.

      • Allero@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        I mean they can make a sneaky update to the client that introduces such changes.

        Sure, if you won’t update your client, this won’t affect you, but would potentially open you up to other security vulnerabilities.

        • refalo@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          This was a real concern with MEGA back in the day (after Kim said you should no longer trust them) and a big reason why I prefer to use standalone client apps that I can control the source of.