• thingsiplay@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    6 months ago

    Lol I wasn’t aware that nano is actually a GNU project. Checking the date on Wikipedia when it became one really threw me off today morning: 2001. Man I was living behind the moon and could not exit properly the entire time!

    • palordrolap@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      I remember using Pico, Nano’s predecessor, in the mid-to-late '90s. Nano was created because there was a desire to distribute Pico with Linux. Unfortunately, the licensing was unclear so a clone had to be made. Fortunately there was no argument about editor appearance and behaviour.

      As shocking as the 2001 date might be, it seems like Pico might have ceased development as recently as the end of 2022 along with its e-mail reader parent program Alpine (formerly Pine).

      If true, Nano still has a few years to go before it will overtake its parent for longevity.

      (Both vi and Emacs are far older, of course.)