• MindTraveller@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    To elaborate: You have absolutely no empirical evidence to back up your claim that homo sapiens don’t suffer consistent illusions. And you never will. It’s entirely vibes based metaphysics. And even so, we do have empirical evidence that homo sapiens do suffer consistent illusions, and your vibes are wrong. “The chance is astronomically remote” how did you calculate that? Did you go check our perceptions against a magic crystal ball? Or did you check them against themselves, which is a tautological and unscientific endeavour?

    As I alluded above, belief in veridical perception directly harms nonbinary people. And other groups too. You’re sitting in an armchair and speculating over metaphysics that you’ll never be able to confirm, while your misconceptions hurt people. Belief in objective reality that aligns with perception is a religion as made up and as harmful as christianity.

    • dudinax@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      “And even so, we do have empirical evidence that homo sapiens”

      You’re trying to have it both ways by equating “homo sapiens [at times] don’t suffer consistent illusions”, which is obviously true since we don’t all have the same experiences, and “homo sapiens [never suffer] consistent illusions” which is equally obviously false because of the evidence you alluded to in the second part.

      • MindTraveller@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        That’s irrelevant to the question of whether perceptions like spacetime are illusory, which was the actual point of the conversation.

        • dudinax@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          If Homo Sapiens don’t always suffer consistent illusions that leaves open the possibility they sometimes perceive reality more or less correctly.

          Also, if there were no possibility of some “veridical perception” there would be no way to gather evidence that some perception is illusory. That’s a good place to look. Demonstrations of consistent illusion must include some new mode of perception that reason dictates is closer to reality.

          • MindTraveller@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            You keep putting the burden of proof on the skeptics. You keep asking that we “prove” your armchair metaphysical conjectures false. Tell you what, I’ll prove that veridical perception doesn’t exist after you prove that Russel’s Teapot isn’t orbiting Mars. Deal?