• wallybeavis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 months ago

    That open sided mag had to be great in the muddy trenches. Who designed this thing?!?! - and who approved this thing for use?!?!?

    • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 months ago

      It was a great idea - let the troops check how much ammo remained in the mag. Shame about the whole “Real world conditions” thing.

      • SSTF@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        The American Model 1915 was a pretty good quick redesign I think.

        Trade the magazine window for a witness hole, go from a moon mag to more conventional box mag, move the vertical grip forward.

    • FireTower@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      Who designed this thing?!?!

      Unironically Louis Chauchat. If memory serves the mags didn’t work in testing when they tried to close them. And they needed machine guns now more than they needed good ones after they would have lost.

      • SSTF@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        One is meant to just hold down the trigger until it’s empty. The Chauchet was one of the first of what we would know as a light machinegun. Mobility in order to support advances was the designated role.

        In a world of bolt action rifles, the ability to lay down controlled bursts was a big firepower multiplier.

        The 20 round magazine would be acceptable for the period. Same capacity as what the M1918A2 BAR was issued with in WW2 and Korea, and only slightly less than the many light machineguns with 30 round magazines that were used for decades after (and in some cases into the current day.)