Another Reddit refugee here,

I think we’re all familiar with the Karma system on Reddit. Do you think Lemmy should have something similar? Because I can see cases for and against it.

For: a way to tracking quality contributions by a user, quantifying reputation. Useful to keep new accounts from spamming communities.

Against: Often not a useful metric, can be botted or otherwise unearned (see u/spez), maybe we should have something else?

What do you all think?

  • Barroux@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    No, karma turned Reddit into a hive mind. Everyone knew what everyone expected in each community and would push people to stay in line in order to not get downvoted.

  • benni@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    Definitely no. In addition to the downsides you mentioned, I feel like the redditor’s desire for karma is what causes these hiveminds/echo chambers and cliché comments that are so typical of many subreddits.

    Edit: Thank you so much for the gold kind stranger!

  • Ace_Addams@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    Karma made Reddit toxic and limited the amount of conversing people did on the site. Here we can have conversations without worrying about down votes and Karma.

  • WetBeardHairs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    Personally, I like that the individual posts and comments have up/down votes. That allows the community to self moderate to some extent. That lightens the load on moderators to police bad content, while simultaneously promoting good content. It also means that the community rules do not need to be so heavy handed as to suppress dialog - take /r/conservative as an example.

    But I do not believe that those votes should carry over to any kind of metric that affects users or communities in other ways. Perhaps a hidden metric available for moderators is useful for identifying problematic posters. But any kind of publicly visible metrics turn into some obnoxious internet point scoring game that invites shitposters and spammers and bot farmers.

  • impulse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s a hard no from me too.

    Upvotes and downvotes exist to filter bad content. Anything that tracks points per user will just lead to toxic karma whoring and bots, as demonstrated by Reddit.

    In my opinion, Lemmy shouldn’t turn into a Reddit clone, it should learn from Reddit’s plethora of mistakes.

  • kerlinnen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Absolutely NO. Karma farmers were always annoying af, and it also makes people mean and annoyingly circle jerky about stuff.

  • Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    A karma metric would just hasten the decline that happened to Reddit. People liked OG Reddit as a forum to connect with like minded people. The karma situation lead to karma farm tactics with the goal of selling accounts or promoting commercial or political content. The lack of karma will remove a reason for bad actors to do the same here. It also removes the karma motivation for low effort reposts.

    Comments should be voted on based on their contribution to the discussion. That’s a natural way to guide the conversation in a productive direction.

    I would prefer Lemmy et al to stay away from broad appeal BS like celebrity AMAs, and karma thirsty low effort people pleasers. It shouldn’t be a place for special events, it should be a place for productive community conversation.

    • Archpawn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      “The karma situation lead to karma farm tactics with the goal of selling accounts or promoting commercial or political content.”

      Without karma, they can promote commercial or political content without bothering with the karma farming. Is that really better?

      • WetBeardHairs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think karma was used as a way to indirectly help their promotions. High karma accounts would have higher prominence on big subreddits, so their posts were more visible and thus more profitable. Reddit (company) wanted big communities, so the problem was a non-problem to them because it drove fake engagement and made their metrics look more valuable from a sales perspective.

  • kwot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    You know what’s funny? I think I voted more on comments here than my several years of reddit already. Having votes kept to individual comments instead of tallied up in your profile like this just feels better to me.

  • hydra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    It shouldn’t. Karma encourages the vices we’ve seen on Reddit like karma farmers, hive minds and threads full of unfunny jokes.

  • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    No. Karma leads to all sorts of dumb behavior like reposting the same 5 videos every day, bots farming karma, hivemind because people are afraid to be downvoted into the negative, etc… I’ve actually been thinking about creating a Reddit alternative that doesn’t have voting at all, or at least not visible voting.

    • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ll admit that I had a bit of pride in my 550k+ karma on my main reddit account, but I’m quite open to sacrificing this for less toxicity.