Logically, yeah—it went from “all X are Y” to “no non-X are Y” (or equivalently, “all Y are X”).
Logically, yeah—it went from “all X are Y” to “no non-X are Y” (or equivalently, “all Y are X”).
When he won before, he was outside the Republican party establishment and just put his own unprepared cronies in charge.
The question at hand is who will be the next president, not who will win your imaginary argument.
while Baz insists he has nothing against crows, it’s the mess they leave behind that has people crying foul.
deleted by creator
That’s what I’m secretly training the crows for.
I doubt the falconer would have any issue with me—I’m helping to keep them employed.
I’m indifferent to squirrels… but my city has hired a falconer to scare the crows away with hawks, so now the crows symbolize the oppressed masses being persecuted by the state.
A crow-calling whistle and a small tin of peanuts.
Someone needs to invent a waterproof suction-mounted device dedicated to recording actual shower thoughts.
Blood Meridian as an illustrated children’s book.
What’s the purpose—research? Tax evasion? Shits and giggles?
According to quantum field theory particles are just fluctuations in fields that permeate all of space, so sure.
(The “fabric of spacetime”, on the other hand, is more of a mental analogy than an actual thing.)
You know that there are two unrelated words, and you’ve seen two different spellings—it’s a natural assumption that the latter stems from the former.
Why so many people would pair them up the same (etymologically unsupported) way, I don’t know… maybe we’re used to correlating words relating to art with French, and assuming that words with “ou” come from French as well (and this case just happens to be an exception).
I use “mold” for both, and regard “mould” as the British spelling for both.
But the etymologies are interesting—the verb comes from French modle, while the fungus comes from late Middle English mould. So if anything, your assumed distinction is etymologically reversed.
One issue specific to the Fediverse is that each instance and each community might have its own standard for what it considers “credible”—and part of another user’s credibility score might come from users on instances with which yours isn’t federated and doesn’t share information.
Not using their turn signals if the only other traffic is pedestrians.
So many times I’ve been crossing an intersection to the opposite corner where I could cross either street first, so I pick the street that won’t block the car crossing the other way. They’re not signalling so I figure they’re going straight, and cross the other way so they won’t have to wait for me—but seemingly every time it turns out the car was really turning after all. So they’re stuck because they couldn’t conceive of pedestrians as traffic they need to communicate with.
A long family tradition.
It’s not like Condorcet’s scenario where every candidate has a pairwise election against every other candidate—it assumes a subversive agenda-setter who presents each new proposal as a yes-or-no alternative to the existing status quo (the previously-accepted proposal). Once a policy is rejected, it isn’t re-introduced.
The Harappan language—then you could decipher the script of the Indus Valley civilization.