I’m not doubting you, but do you have any sources? I’d like to read more.
I’m not doubting you, but do you have any sources? I’d like to read more.
I’ve been registered to vote in blue and red states and the barriers to vote in red states are so much higher. Lines are longer, in less convenient locations, registration has to be done earlier, and sometime they might not count your vote or purge a voter directory and you have to check yourself to see if that the case so you can correct it. It’s more than people can’t be arsed to vote; it is intentionally made as inconvenient as possible.
I’m just a simple statistican, but I would be more worried about sun exposure, tap water quality, air quality, processed foods and occupational hazards (depending on job) over 3-4 drinks per year.
The better conclusion is “people who drink in moderation have a decreased risk of cancer”, which is different. Causation is hard to prove, especially when we can only ethically do observational studies. It’s likely that people who drink in moderation are more likely to make healthy choices in other areas of their life or have other factors that reduce risk.
I understand your conclusion, but in my experience not many people are advocating for reducing their 1st amendment rights. The majority of my experience with people claiming free speech is when it doesn’t apply. Like it does not protect anyone from being laughed at, ostracized, does not force people to buy goods or services from someone who says wild shit, and no one is required to give them a platform.
People only invoke the feelings of the founders when they either don’t have a stronger argument or are trying to appeal to conservatives. It’s basically religious interpretation at this point - mostly used to manipulate people who don’t know better.
I think weak labor protections for a people that commonly live paycheck to paycheck with health insurance from those jobs, poor social programs should they lose those jobs and a police force that has a robust history of violently shutting down protests might also have a hand
Indulgences are always bullshit.
Fuck em. I’ll use nebula.
I bought it today to play for the first time and I’m trying to decide between playing it on steam deck or blow some cobwebs off the vive.
Either you went to a highly atypical drag show or a strip club without stripping. I think having a work-sponsored drag show is inappropriate and bit cringe, but it’s not more risqué than cabaret.
Doesn’t help that she was a prosecutor in California during three strikes. She’s basically a cop.
That is the only version of that movie I have seen.
I’d be surprised if the subreddit survives the IPO anyways
I’m coming to conclusion that corperations sometime have an almost pro-wrestling outlook and make their CEO’s heels. Again and again, CEO’s make themselves publicly quite villainous, the company fires them, then rolls back 5% of their unpopular decisions in the name of “good will”. I will be shocked if spez has this job in 3 months and both reddit and spez will be richer for it.
Some pregnant women get outies in their second or third trimester, so there must be an amount of force that would do the same.
I stopped using shampoo and condition once a week. My scalp looks great and my hair is neither greasy nor dry.