I’m not justifying either- I’m just saying that Hamas is the responsible party
I’m not justifying either- I’m just saying that Hamas is the responsible party
Fundamentally it comes down to who is more at fault for the death of a human shield, the one who is using the human shield or the one who is attacking.
Clearly Hamas is more at fault. If you want peace tell Hamas to surrender and return the hostages.
It’s naive to say that kindness is going to stop violence from a group who in their founding charter call for the death of the opposing group. Hanas isn’t a good faith group and no amount of kindness will change that.
Any solution that will be durable requires that Hanna’s is not a part of it.
Just to note- Hamas was elected to govern in 2007. They are the elected governing body of Gaza. This is to say there are two governments at war.
I would also ask, as to responsibility: if Hamas fires a rocket from behind a human shield, and the innocent is killed as a result of return fire- wouldn’t Hamas be responsible for the war crime? Aren’t they responsible for the innocent life due to their purposeful choice to involve the innocent from the beginning?
Hamas has Jewish eradication as part of its founding charter. I’m not sure this qualifies a one sided fight.
Not to say it’s not true- but I’d wait a few days till we have more info before saying it absolutely did happen- see the hospital or church bombings for example.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-67144061
I’m just saying. Hamas is a terrorist organization known for lying. They have a clear reason to do so here, and the evidence suggests they are in fact lying. This isn’t to justify a war, it’s to say that they are misleading here.
Hamas put their headquarters in the hospital
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Shifa_Hospital
Hamas put their headquarters there…
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Shifa_Hospital
Please check this first.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Shifa_Hospital
Check it. Like it sucks but…
Hamas put their headquarters in the hospital. That’s on hamas bro.
It’s an interesting article, but it’s not an exhaustive look at the situation. Look buddy- the article is from the point of an American, and proscribes American actions that should be taken. While that is interesting, it doesn’t touch nearly at all on what the current parties should do (vis a vis Hamas and Israel) and it doesn’t apply ANY scrutiny to Hamas or suggest any actions they should take.
It’s not that it’s not an insightful piece, but it’s POV is limited, and can’t be applied generally.