I have only my own experience to back it up. I’ve always washed my wooden utensils in the dishwasher (top rack only). The cheapest ones do ok, but show some wear after a few years. The bamboo ones look as good today as when they were purchased (10+ years ago).
Not that much of a problem, and even less so if you use bamboo utensils.
Heyday is what you mean, I think.
It’s deader than all those people in tiananmen square
Pros:
Lots of land
Natural resources
Coastal access
Cons:
Shitty power grid
Rednecks
Consensus:
worth fighting to keep, but if we’re going to do that, take the opportunity to cleanup the more vocal of the rednecks.
If they are just simulated, they aren’t real (even if close). If they aren’t real, what difference does it make? They are NPCs.
FLAC or some other lossless format is better.
There are 2 choices so they are equally likely
There are only two options at that point. It MUST be 50-50.
The host’s intentions are irrelevant. Numerically, there are only two choices. That makes it fifty-fifty.
Now you have 2 choices: the door you chose, or the only other door left. One has a goat and one has a car. That’s fifty-fifty.
In your explanation, the door originally had a 1% chance, but after showing 98 goats, it has a 50% chance.
After you find out there’s a goat behind door #2, you have a 50% chance whether you stay on 1 or move to three. There are only two possible outcomes at that point (car or goat), so either way it’s a coin flip.
“old” & “late 90s” = Go straight to hell, young’un!
If it truly is only an hour of someone’s time, then I’d much rather they made that insignificant amount less profit, but did the work to make our experience better.
They can, but many do not.
I keep multiple versions in the same library. I use Emby, and, as long as my naming is good, I get one listing for each movie, and the ability to select which version to watch.
You just reminded me of something I saw once, that I’d love to find. It was some sketch comedy show, and the sketch was “Every episode of Star Trek”. It was hysterical.
Possibly, but I’d think there’s an equal chance that it interests new customers. I’d have to see data proving either way.
But it’s still ridiculous to be so concerned about the corporation that made a kabillion dollars in profit last year. If they’re so go at their business that they can make those kinds of profits, one leaked image is not a problem.
Won’t someone think of the corporations?!
One thing nobody ever considers about landlords. . . It costs them a considerable amount of money for their property to be empty. Most of them will accept slightly lower rents to keep the property occupied constantly. This cost avoidance ensures that there are always landlords at below market value, thus keep the higher rents in check.