You could simply keep that to yourself.
Professional developer and amateur gardener located near Atlanta, GA in the USA.
You could simply keep that to yourself.
Those were the terms OP used lol. But yeah, generally people view comics as western rather than a catch all term.
Are you trying to make it look like vitiligo or just make your face super pale? If you make it look super pale and uniform I don’t think anyone is going to question it.
Dahmer – Monster: The Jeffrey Dahmer Story
Sid Meier’s Civilization is a weird name.
All 6 of those names are fine to me. VVVVVV is borderline but not nearly as bad as some of the stuff here.
I genuinely thought that name was a joke about Fire Emblem for so long.
Sorry for making a suggestion.
The advice I stick to is letting your commit message follow “applying this commit will BLANK.” So like “Fix error when blah” as opposed to “fixes error when blah”
I just see thread titles, I don’t really check the community. It meets OP’s criteria. Also, not everyone is interested in the same level of privacy. I’m never going to go through the Herculean task of degoogling myself, too much stuff uses my Gmail. It’s just not worth it. I only have so much time in the day to enjoy myself. Aggressively turning things off like personalized ads, sharing data, etc. is acceptable to me.
Like a paramecium?
I don’t think that’s what most people mean by the term crush. It sounds like you’re describing something closer to stalking.
Google Keep is the most amazing app for this. You can make a checklist and when you check stuff off it goes to the bottom. If you uncheck it it goes back up. Perfect for maintaining a shopping list. My wife and I used to use a shared note on there as our shopping list.
It felt more like a threat. Like “if you’re not the type of person to enjoy that then look somewhere else”
It’s much more involved than that. For example, static type systems involve checking that the functions you call accept the types of parameters you’re supplying then. It’s a necessary part of static typing but alone is not sufficient.
If this code were a valid program in some hypothetical language but only failed at runtime then that would be an example of dynamic typing because the types cannot be verified statically (e.g., at compile time).
var a = 1
a = "a"
But you’re right, I don’t really know of any languages like that. I could’ve sworn I heard this called strong typing but I can’t easily find a source. And strong/weak typing are a mess of definitions nobody agrees on.
I was looking for fully remote jobs recently. All the local jobs are back to 3 days in office. One of the recruiters said something like “our employees are happy to go into the office three days a week” and my eyes nearly rolled out of my skull.
Java, the language so good you compile it twice!
People want to buy and sell portions of companies. Stock markets let them do that. Things like fractional shares and ETFs allow individual investors to invest more easily which is great, but it would be naive to think the big firms don’t have more of an advantage. People yap about the efficient market hypothesis a lot while forgetting that it’s a hypothesis. If someone can get an advantage they’ll do it. It’s still wide advice for newbies who think they r cracked the code lol but for reals big players can and do find opportunities to make money that other people don’t know about.