The future of PCs in general is tied to professionals and gamers, there is no need for a pc anymore in an household who is not anything of the above

Which means that the average PC user will become more and more tech savy, this is the only thing that could raise the Linux market share

On the other hand I don’t see a single chance of linux becoming relevant in personal computing unless a big corporation decides to offer an experience that is/has:

• A polieshed UI, something eye-pleasing like MacOs
• Noob friendly in the sense that it offers a 100% TRUE terminal-free experience
• Reliable across hardware of any kind, the average user doesn’t want to worry about graphic or wifi drivers. Heck the average user doesn’t even know what a driver is
• Not buggy
• An easy way to install any software they need, today’s program coverage in various software centers often doesn’t fulfill the needs of the average user

Woah he predicted the past

Found the solution boyz

The main purpose is to create a sentiment of dissatisfaction for the current government

Edit: I am just pointing out their purpose, it doesn’t mean that I share their view boyz

I have been using arch for 2 years but couldn’t be bothered anymore with things breaking and needing to debug them

I am now rocking mint and I have absolutely no complains except for the not very polished UI

deleted by creator

What if I decide to print my own book? A book that has no copyright at all, should the print shop prevent me from doing so?

As you (hopefully) can see a print shop has no job enforcing the law just as much as an advertiser has to

Enforcing the law is for law enforcement

If someone wants to restrict their services out of willingness it is fine, I just think you can’t be required to do so

According to the law you are required to remove it as soon as you know it is there, but if you are not the original uploader you are not going to be held responsible

It is the law’s job to prevent and stop scams not of the platform that provides the advertising

If I had a printing shop (not sure how is it called in English) should I be the one who checks that what is written on the handouts is legit? Heck no, I don’t have the means for that.

It is the law’s job to prevent and stop scams not of the platform that provides the advertising

If I had a printing shop (not sure how is it called in English) should I be the one who checks that what is written on the handouts is legit? Heck no, I don’t have the means for that.

That clarifies the whole thing, thanks

I have been seeding until I reach a 3 ratio, so am I doing so through my real ip?

Is it visible to copyright holders?

I did bind qbittorrent to the mullvad interface so there is no doubt I am using the VPN, the question is how is it possible that I am reaching a 3 ratio when I shouldn’t be able to seed at all?

Found this apparently other people are seeding as well

What do you mean? Is that needed for torrenting?

I have been using mullvad for a month and have 2 tb of Linux isos, should I expect a call from someone?

Why are you mentioning dns? This is an ip request, no need to contact a dns server

Noob question. Would that request travel over the internet or is it resolved locally?

At least 6

Yeah I bet they feel so good about having the perfect recipe for naming variables, a recipe only they know or care about

Camel case for local variables

Pascal case for global ones

The name should tell me it’s purpose

That’s it

deleted by creator