Does this still count as a crossbow if it isn’t the arms that are storing the energy?

I can headcanon that.

Pixie and Brutus is so cute.

Pineapples are a freak fruit though.They grow on some kind of weird weed like some kind of joke.

Don’t forget Calvados n_n

Also apples used to be small, tart, and acidic.

You wouldn’t eat them as a dessert but as a basis for brewing alcohol.

It’s wild how much fruits changed in recent times.

So much so that most zoo are stoppimg giving them to animals and switched to more leafy greens. They have gotten so sugary that they promoted tooth decay and obesity.

Yeah flakey would be a better term altthough I’d still put it in the crunchy umbrella. Like flakey means the exterior is kinda crunchy.

Otoh don’t take me too seriously I like to dunk them in coffee or milk :p

Count me in.

The only issue I see with it is that since it’s wrapped in plastic it’s gonna be soft and rubbery instead of crunchy.

disgusted French look of superiority

jkjk it looks like something terrible in a good way.

oof. That was an excessively painful comment to read.

As they say: safety rules are written in hogweed sap.

Not really.

From experience both take a similar kind of know how.

Imho the speed waxes and wanes along the editions.

Remember how fast as fuckAlara was and how they slowed everything down with Innistrad?

I believe Bill Maher could suck the fun out of a bouncy castle by his mere presence.

I think they meant 2e6$

I haven’t but will do so from now on.

Yeah ofc females is an issue. We have the word “women” which is more specific and less loaded.

And no, tits aren’t sexual by essence. No body parts are and it’s all social constructs.

• Peoples who don’t traditionally cover their chests don’t tend to sexualize breasts either.
• At some point in France, ankles used to be sexualised. It seems silly now, doesn’t it?

Plus lil kids tend to already see lots of tits since they feed on them.

Yes I am weird but I’m also right 😉

The word females is an issue

We have this neat little concept called “women” that is specific to humans and also refers to a social role.

Using “female” is - by opposition - quite dehumanizing.

but if they got their tits out in public in-front of lil kids…. Thats ok???

First and foremost, kids spent their first few monthes suckling on tits. They kinda know what they look like. Or should breastfeeding women hide their breast from their infants? 🤣

Then sexualising parts of the human body is a social construct:

• Peoples who don’t usually cover their chests don’t tend to sexualise breasts either.
• At some point it was considered inappropriate to show your ankles for a woman. It seems silly now doesn’t it?

So since human breasts (and any body part by extension) aren’t intrinsically sexual, there should be no issue showing them to anyone, kids included.

(Otoh I am obv not condoning any interactions with any kind of sexual intent with minors or young adults with a significant age gap)

Youre weird af

I am but I am also right 😉

Incel has moved in English from “involutary celibate” to mysoginistic.

I’m not saying you are but you sure speak like one…

Calling women females is at best weird and insensitive for example.

Rugby players tend to prefer a slice of toast.