I hope this one also has Sam Neill!

Maybe the ‘what the customer wants’ route would have been more successful?

Bit those who lose are traditionally put down (shot and sold for glue) by the Queen herself.

Wow, school shootings, no probs. Big trump hurt his ear, fucking panic!

Now I don’t need that sneaky avocado!

Coming up next, “What is Web 3.0 and how can it be avoided?”

File my tax, wash a car, press A to not die…

It’s a loading screen of exploitation.

I would make some 1000 monkeys with typewriters comment, but I see what most actual contracted devs produce…

Wow l, i didnt know this was a thing. I’m the visual version of this - which i already know sucks less.

I wonder whether you don’t get songs stuck in your head… like as a consolation prize at least?

This thing in quotes?
Searching for not that! Did you mean that? Okay, here’s nothing.

I was wondering… passwords with attitude?

As someone savvy to tmwhats behind it all… I have to give you a painful upvote!

Same deal as sexism. Even if you get in, your work will probably be stolen or you will be pushed out.

Surely we now have the technology

Nah, sounds “like a password”

Sell it to musk, finish the job

Sorry, there is currently a disruption of service. However, we do offer 99.9% life uptime.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Punt_gun?wprov=sfla1

Punt guns were usually custom-designed and varied widely, but could have bore diameters exceeding 2 inches (51 mm) and fire over a pound (≈ 0.45 kg) of shot at a time. A single shot could kill over 50 waterfowl resting on the water’s surface. They were too big to hold and the recoil was so large that they had to be mounted directly on punts used for hunting, hence their name. Hunters would manoeuvre their punts quietly into line and range of the flock using poles or oars to avoid startling them. Generally, the gun was fixed to the punt; thus the hunter would manoeuvre the entire boat in order to aim the gun. The guns were sufficiently powerful, and the punts sufficiently small, that firing the gun often propelled the punt backwards several inches or more. To improve efficiency, hunters could work in fleets of up to around ten punts.

Sounds delightful. I’m sure that nothing is explained at length repeatedly in a 35 minute meeting that could have been a message

I think we know where this is going…