Allseer

bots in the chat

your only logic is blame someone else for being a murderer

it’s faar more reasonable to avoid resorting to sapping just to kidnap and attack civilians you don’t like

“We are the victims!” while they threaten and attack everyone that doesn’t agree

so you can’t leave then decide to fly on a bicycle to attack for the sake of pr, brilliant nobel peace prize flawless victory please continue

this is what happens when an unstoppable force meets an immovable object

he means burfor. whichever one sounds less like bullshit. he’s trying really hard leave him alone

dude its not the easterners killing its the westerners the majority demographic that are blowing up everyone and their momerz

you’re saying palestinians have been denied supplies and have been in a blockade for decades? are you aware that an actually besieged population resorts to cannibalism within a month’s time?

Iranian politely threatens a nation besieged less than three weeks ago.

lets see how they feel it about after thriller starts playing.

coalminers: just making money, making sure my children have no future

thanks for the sauce. Its very enlightening.

it does trouble me to think that the creators of stable diffusion could be financially punished. Did they at least try to compensate the artists in anyway?

It “feels” as though it parallels consultation. These creatives are literally paid for their creations. If a software constructs a neural network to emulate intellectual property, does that count as consultation? Could/Should it apply to the software developers or individuals using the software?

From the technical side, I don’t understand how all the red flags aren’t already there. the source material was taken, and now any individual could acquire that exact material or anything “in the spirit of” that material through a single service. Is this a new way to pirate?

stable diffusion is a great opportunity for small businesses. especially in an increasingly anti-small business america (maybe that’s just california?) I’d hate for it become inaccessible to creators that would wield it properly.

as long as creatives retain the ability to sue the bad actors, i’m glad. I personally don’t need Open or whomever is directly responsible for stable diffusion and its training data to be punished.

i don’t know the specifics of the lawsuit but i imagine this would parallel piracy.

in a way you could say that Open has pirated software directly from multiple intellectual properties. Open has distributed software which emulates skills and knowledge. remember this is a tool, not an individual.

amazing

it looks like the Kuratas. isn’t this too dangerous to give to just anyone?

i think they had an idea, a good one, but then at the last moment realized that it was all too dangerous and expensive in practice.

then they tried doing some weird hybrid between “professional” wrestling and a documentary.

poor planning was the ultimate downfall. i had high hopes.

You’re humanizing the software too much. Comparing software to human behavior is just plain wrong. GPT can’t even reason properly yet. I can’t see this as anything other than a more advanced collage process.

Open used intellectual property without consent of the owners. Major fucked.

If ‘anybody’ does anything similar to tracing, copy&pasting or even sampling a fraction of another person’s imagery or written work, that anybody is violating copyright.

does daddy know you’re peeking over the wall?

just avoid clouds