The NHS, wages and civil rights were all on the chopping block of the Tories for decades, and people still voted for them in droves.
The NHS, wages and civil rights were all on the chopping block of the Tories for decades, and people still voted for them in droves.
The problem with that approach is that just finding a scapegoat doesn’t solve the issue. The Brits and the EU still have to live with the consequences.
The proper way to address this is to analyze what happened and make sure that it will never happen again. If the result of that analysis is that voters are fucking idiots, we somehow have to alleviate that.
Putin is playing the long game by buying up political parties all over Europe and the US for the last decade, and now it’s starting to pay off.
That’s just a declaration of intent, nothing has been decided yet in that regard.
Yes, but the current govt’s ministry has to pay the fine for his actions.
That’s a neat trick, at the last second rack up some bills and then let the next party pay them.
They’re still in first place.
Basically he gambled that Putin will die before him.
Well, that didn’t work out as planned for him.
I’ll never understand why he intentionally let himself be captured by Russia. The outcome was inevitable.
Neither side celebrates Christmas.
Stringing is unavoidable with bowden extruders. Don’t waste time trying to fix it.
In nearly every European election since this year, the local Russia-controlled parties have taken over government (if they weren’t the government already, like in Hungary). This will continue next year, especially in the EU parliament. I wouldn’t hold my breath that any help will come from Europe any time soon.
Monarchies are way easier to control than democracies, so this isn’t surprising.
You can see that with Russia, it took them an ungodly amount of money and decades of propaganda to take over the Western democracies.
The concept of money is built in a way that once you have a lot of it, it doesn’t go away any more.
Those pledges are empty words anyways.
Blender is well received in the industry and can compete with the best. It also has a few nice features that aren’t standard and make it stand out among the competition.
FreeCAD is none of that.
Fusion 360 is amazing in the Getting Shit Donetm department, which is the weak point of FreeCAD. I have managed to steer through the byzantine UI of FreeCAD to create a CAD model, but it needed support by someone who has spent years in that application to get the more complex stuff, and even he didn’t exactly know how to achieve it, and that’s on top of me having participated in a 16 hour workshop on how to use FreeCAD. For Fusion 360, I’ve watched a few 5 minute videos on their official channel and that’s it, everything else I was able to accomplish through just looking at the UI.
I learned Fusion 360 before FreeCAD, so it’s not just that I had prior experience in another similar tool.
I think the basic problem with FreeCAD is that it’s a collection of tool benches written by different people who don’t talk to each other. They have overlapping responsibilities while still having vastly different feature sets and don’t integrate with each other most of the time. So, if you want to create a model, you first have to plan ahead to understand what kind of features it’s going to have, and based on that, you have to decide which collection of tool benches you have to pick. More than once I picked the wrong one in the start and then had to do everything all over again in the different one once I ran into a dead end.
Fusion 360 feels like it was written by a single team with a single vision, and everything fits together.
He’d get a medal here. We have offical signs with “pigeons are flying rats” here.
It’ll settle somewhere around 3° to 5°, because that’s the point where the global economy collapses irrecoverably. There’s no other way that we’re going to get out of this.
No, the referendum was non-binding, it was passed by executive action.