Some protocols, like ICMP, don’t have the concept of ports at all!

Why not here?

I hope there is a heavy hand on moderation. It’s extremely tiring when I see an astronomy article about Uranus with 15 comments, and they’re all very juvenile jokes.

Oh if they don’t even have support, yeah I would have moved away a long time ago.

Oh I thought you meant it just doesn’t reply to DDNS updates. If it doesn’t even reply to DNS queries, yeah that’s a big issue. What did their support have to say about it?

Does your IP address really change that often?

Flexibility. Maybe they get a hosting package that includes domain registration and hosting, but they can’t put anything else under that name.

Guarantee? You’d have to open it up and disable the cellular radio. The OS can override any settings you make.

I would just turn off media uploads entirely. It’s not worth the risk or disk space.

Looks scary. Let’s check the authors! Are they trustworthy, or are they lying?

Primary author Claire Rogers - Dermatology Physician Assistant. While I’m sure she has medical training, I don’t see any experience with strokes or vaccines specifically.

James A Thorp - OB/GYN with The Wellness Company, a right-wing alternative medicine scam company: https://www.thedailybeast.com/the-wellness-company-is-being-spruiked-by-kari-lake-laura-loomer-naomi-wolf-and-others/

Kirstin Cosgrove - No real results. One LinkedIn profile for a Clinical Research Consultant at Johnson & Johnson, though this paper says she’s an independent researcher. Apparently her employer would disapprove of this work.

Peter A McCullough - Usually the person providing the most support but not doing the most science gets listed last, and here is no exception. This guy has a Wikipedia article that is both thorough and well-sourced. It speaks for itself.

Yes, Radarr and the rest of the *arr stack.

But they’re working on it!

Personally, I’m still just waiting on lab meat.

Which shouldn’t be that much of a problem, because everyone is going to be sealed in a closed environment anyway. There will be losses, but it’s not like we’d be venting water vapor into the atmosphere.

If we can terraform enough to sustain an atmosphere to hold water vapor, we’d probably also be able to produce enough liquid water somehow, since they’re both in the same region of science fiction right now. Maybe there’s enough hydrogen and oxygen in the geology somewhere. If not, maybe we could produce them from nuclear reactions. But that would be very energy-consuming, so like I said, science fiction.

No, yeast is fungi.

That’s what the fresh cut grass smell is.

Pretty well, actually. Grasses like corn, wheat, rice, and oats make up a substantial portion of the typical diet.

Harvesting does not imply a resource is renewable. Most crops are annuals, and we eat the parts needed for reproduction, or harvest them before maturity.

That said, I’m not sure if “renewable” is the right word. On Earth, the water cycle purifies water through evaporation and ground filtering, but not quickly enough for human use, so we process our wastewater and distill our drinking water. On Mars, the environment is not suitable for a water cycle (too cold, not enough water, atmospheric losses), so any captured water should be processed and reused without release.

The study seems good, but the conclusion is backwards. ED in particular is often a symptom of conditions like stress, not a cause. If this is part of China’s push to have more babies, they should improve living conditions first and babies will naturally follow.

Yes, but inefficiently.

No.