The page is written as if there’s more to come (“This is not the correct patch, but we will come to that”), but I don’t see any further pages. Is this explaination unfinished or did I just miss where it continues? (I’m not used to Gitlab.)

Just imagine the potential for a govt/EU to revoke your oficial / legal identity at any time :)

A government doesn’t need to take away your papers to deny you its services.

Wait til you find out how many people were killed by capitalist governments

One for communists is hardly any different [to one for nazis] as far as I’m concerned.

What do you expect to happen when you call a group of people “hardly any different [to nazis]”?

Communism does not advocate genocide any more than capitalism does. A capitalist society may commit genocide, a communist society may commit genocide. Neither are required to by their economic systems.

National socialism directly advocates for genocide.

It’s a ridiculous statement to compare communists to nazis and it’s not surprising that insulting communists like that will get you banned.

(Adding islamism to the comparison just makes the statement even more bizarre.)

He could have almost any woman he wanted thanks to his wallet

Perhaps what he wanted wasn’t a whore

Eternity sometimes replaces a post’s thumbnail with that of a post further down the list.

Are there any performance benchmarks for the Star64?

Pine64 claims the chip to have performance similar to certain Cortex-A55 processors, which would put the Star64 on par with the Raspberry 4 series. Is that true?

Television and magazines are far more general. Television as a medium could be compared to Web as a medium. YT could be compared to a specific TV channel.

I have no idea what you are trying to say.

Maybe read it again, in context, and decide if there are equal rights to initiate that particular interaction (no matter what the genders or sexualities involved are).

Are you saying that two people, no matter the genders or sexualities, never have the same right to initiate undressing in front of each other? What?

Then have a stern word with yourself about being so incredibly defensive that you end up portraying yourself as a sex pest.

Defensive? I’m neither a gay man nor a heterosexual woman. This doesn’t affect me at all.

it was always initiated by them

Did you mention this randomly or do you believe that you have less right to initiate that than they do?

Riot Games behaves terribly?

deleted by creator

in many cases when people bring up boy’s or men’s issues they will only do so while simultaneously attacking feminist talking points.

This is very much a talking point by “only girls can have issues” people.

“Men don’t have issues, men’s rights groups only exist to spread misogyny!”

That is a key point of why the idea that men’s issues are not taken seriously is spreading, because simply talking about / focusing on men’s issues quickly gets people labled as misogynists.

This both gets people to stop caring about the idea of misogynism, because “apparently simply talking about men’s issues is misogyny”, and thereby also pushes people to develop more problematic views.

uses a modern Notebook which is QubesOS certified and runs coreboot

You seem to be missing my point.

This tool would not increase censorship.

Admins are already able to implement all censorship they want.

Admins are already able to block left-wing opinions, right-wing opinions, child porn, normal porn.

And that already happens.

Lots of instances (like feddit.de) block pornographic content.

Lots of instances (like lemmy.blahaj.zone) block right-wing content.

It is already possible, and it is already happening.

An AI which can detect CSAM (and potentially other content) won’t change that. It will simply make the admins’ job easier.

I don’t know how you get the impression that this increases censorship.

Instance admin already manually block content. And they are already able to do that to any extend they wish to do.

This tool would simply automate that process.

Admins would not gain or lose any ability to block content. Identifying child porn would simply be easier.

(Imagine an admin going to their database and doing a CTRL+F with the term “child porn”, and then going through the posts to find offending ones. But instead of CTRL+F it’s an AI.)

(For some reason I don’t get a notification when you answer my comment. Is that a known issue? Did you block me or something?)

South America is not “mainland of America”? What do you consider “mainland of America” if south America is not part of it?

I’d be like “Oh boy let me get redirected to lots of useful answers to my question next time too”.

I don’t understand why you would frame that as being “slapped”. Does having your question marked as a duplicate hurt your feelings?

That’s not the point. Yes, child porn sites can host child porn. Other sites/instances can’t stop that. But what other instances can stop, is redistributing said child porn. And for that purpose, such technology would be useful.