Because the linux is explicitly only gpl2. If it was gpl2+ then gpl3 code could use it. It’s a very known problem around the incompatibility of some licenses. The kernel people explicitly only want to use gpl2 and refuse changing the license because it’s better for companies that want to use linux without giving back the code.

Newer Scala follows rhe same when enabling strict equaility. It’s a goos thing.

Dude, that’s the dream.

Same. It was highly uncomfortable.

Yes.

Embrace and Extend. An old and tried technique proven to work deeply integrated into the dna of what MS are.

You need to be a donkey for that to work out.

There’s so much hen-tai potential here that I’m almost convinced to go do the research.

It just sounds easier to think about it with wireguard then. No surprises.

That’s really the issue right? These people don’t think.

Nop, have fun being the refugees for once. We’ll sink some boats when you people try to arrive or put you all in some camps “temporarily”.

Reality sucks.

I never even knew that in other countries you could just grab one without putting a coin. Absolutely insane.

That was the explicit goal of having huge irrelevant release numbers and to constantly release new versions: making sure nobody cares much and upgrade without much problems constantly to ensure security and web improvements are always there in users hands.

That’s freaking amazing, basically half of the typical 14’'.

And we’ll get laid off anyways either it’s useful or not.

The official service is bound to need a SSO login from bad privacy related providers. They insist in not allowing a simple account creation with just email and password.

Do people actually not?

This has been the recommendation and the way to do it for decades everywhere I’ve been too.

If the objective was to save time…

This is great news for the aliens.