I remember walking around Blockbuster and stumbling into what seems to be buddy cop movie starring him and Jay Leno
IMDb: : Collision Course https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0097081/
Was never brave enough to watch it
I remember walking around Blockbuster and stumbling into what seems to be buddy cop movie starring him and Jay Leno
IMDb: : Collision Course https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0097081/
Was never brave enough to watch it
posts on youtube
I’m appalled by the fact that Google News is promoting garbage AI-generated articles that plagiarize and distort the original work of journalists. This is not only unethical, but also harmful to the quality and credibility of news. Google should have stricter standards and filters for what qualifies as news, and not just rely on algorithms that can be easily manipulated by spammers. I want to read authentic and original stories that are well-researched and verified, not some AI nonsense that is full of errors and nonsense. Google News is supposed to be a trusted source of information, not a platform for spreading misinformation and propaganda.
– this comment powered by GPT-4
A combination of:
On the windows side, there were neat apps like Stardock Windowblinds, for the most part, everything was paid and expensive for someone with no disposable income.
Mind was blown when I realized everything I wanted was available for free! My first install was actually from a CD that came with a book I checked out from the public library
It says one is not able to use the new API for all scenarios
Mr Coffee single cup machine, makes hot or iced, 1 cup at a time, its awesome! no more stupid pods
https://www.amazon.com/Mr-Coffee-IcedTM-Hot-Maker/dp/B093XTHCZL/
I don’t use either of those 👍
Send all my traffic to google? No thanks
So you’d essentially be proposing that we don’t help
Excuse me? I haven’t proposed anything. I’m simply asking questions because the headline/description seemed misleading to me and not adequately conveying the full story/situation. Purely from a math/stats/logic point of view
I’m wondering what is the percentage of homeless that are addicts or have mental health issues. You seem to be confident they are outliers, but what is the percentage? Is it 1%? 25%? 50%?
Seems like a logical fallacy to me without knowing that stat.
“The study did not include people who are street-entrenched or who have serious addictions or mental health issues”
Seems kind of disingenuous to leave out people who are addicted to alcohol or drugs. No, that’s not most of them, but yes that is some of them.
The study simple ignores them so how can one make conclusions like “contrary to what people believe” and “the opposite of what people think” without actually considering the subject in question
It should make you distrustful of politics, lawmakers, lobbyists, and capitalism not science itself. Pure science is unbiased and systematic, by definition.
Ride a bike. You get exercise, sunlight, cheap transportation, thrills/adventure, and good feelings, it’s a win win
And if possible, find a local social bicycling group near you. Adds even more benefits when you are riding with a group
deleted by creator
Another reddit alternative https://www.reddit.com/r/RedditAlternatives/comments/145om2g/a_little_about_tildes/
Looks ok but I don’t think its federated
IR blaster. You could have a universal remote app and control any tv from my palm PDA
What about if you just jump, especially really high? or stand on a ladder? :P
Does the TI monopoly extend to other states? Guess I never thought about it before, but was almost excited to see Casio’s could potentially be used elsewhere