Where does the butt start?

Nope

Yeah but it’s like the PATRIOT Act (it’s an anagram Im just lazy). The PATRIOT Act had been kicking around DC for decades before we had an excuse to pass it. The ICCJ bill was no different.

You need to look into the Project for a New American Century. It’s a PAC that most of GWB’s initial team was on and were asking fir war with Iraq in 1997. Wanna guess who in the GWB administration was not part of it?

The USA has NEVER supported the ICCJ and this was not a new policy the Bush 43 administration devised on their own.

Specifically the complaint is the PA used US aide funds to compensate the family of a martyr who killed an American citizen. The USA asked the PA to refund that money and they refused so the USA is refusing to further give them funds.

As an aside the source here is practically a mouthpiece for the Muslim Brotherhood and is as a result an incredibly biased source. Keep that bias in mind when you read them just like you should remember the bias of Radio Free Asia.

Sorry if I wasn’t clearer but yes this is going to address a part of the problem but what many think of when we think of homeless people are the chronically unhoused and those people’s issues are largely mental issues rather than purely financial. This program addresses recent homelessness.

Whoops

115 of 722 people met the standards and maintained contact. We have no idea what the total shelter population was that the study looked at.

“We screened 732 participants from 22 shelters from four shelter organizations across Metro Vancouver. Our preregistered screening criteria were: age 19 to 65, homeless for less than 2 y (homelessness defined as the lack of stable housing), Canadian citizen or permanent resident, and nonsevere levels of substance use (DAST-10) (21), alcohol use (AUDIT) (22), and mental health symptoms Colorado Symptom Index (CSI) (23) based on predefined thresholds (see SI Appendix, Table S1 in SI Appendix, section 1.3.2). These screening criteria were used to reduce any potential risks of harm (e.g., overdose) from the cash transfer. To ensure accurate responses, the screening survey was conducted under a cover story without any mention of the cash transfer. Of the 732 participants, 229 passed all criteria (31%). Due to loss of contact with 114 participants despite our repeated attempts to reach them, we successfully enrolled 115 participants in the study as the final sample (50 cash, 65 noncash; see Table 1). The sample size was modest but was nonetheless adequately powered to detect statistically significant effects from the preregistered power analysis”

For those not paying attention they chose the people most likely to return to society and gave them the ability to do so. This would resolve homelessness for those who just need a helping hand. This will not address those who are homeless by choice (usually due to mental illness) or are extremely mentally ill.

Im not saying it is a bad study or an idea we should not pursue but no one should look at this as a way to “solve” homelessness.

With fancy leases the car has a black box they will sell it as a feature to record when your car is stolen or monitor it in crashes. What it also does is monitor your speed. For the cars I sold, the lease agreement you signed to lease the car had language informing you of data collection regarding your driving.

If downvotes bother you not every instance has them.

I did read what you wrote and that is why I wrote what I did.

Locking people up is a false equivalence with execution.

You are now attempting to move the goalposts now.

No one moved the goalposts before this. You provided a false equivalence and are now attempting to move the goalposts.

Locking people in a cage as a consequence of their misdeeds is different than the state killing to prove killing people is wrong and immoral.

Take a minute to actually educate yourself about how incredibly badly we handle the death penalty. I have met too many men who were 100% innocent if their crime who got put on death row because of incompetence by investigators or prosecution to support it.

60% and below is failing but below 70% is below average (which make no sense mathematically)

The thing is most comedies aren’t great. The films you listed were all just ok in their times except Hot Shots which was a great spoof film but was not a great film overall.

Why do we kill people to show that killing people is wrong? -“Foolish Notion” Holly Near

I don’t think you can remove it without murdering most of the planet. I do not think authoritarianism and murder are preferable to religion.

deleted by creator