We could consider those politicians employees of TurboTax and H&R Block just with extra steps

Your wife isn’t a part of the group I’m talking about, then.

Because every one of these fuckers who claims to have the “phobia” in question CONSTANTLY SHARES IMAGES OF THINGS THAT SUPPOSEDLY TRIGGER THE PHOBIA.

There is a contradiction here. You framed your unpopular opinion as being every one of them is faking it and posting about it but you are also saying there are other groups of them that you are not angry at or addressing in your post. Your real opinion is that some people pretend to have phobias and some people actually have phobias. And that is not an unpopular opinion, nor an interesting one.

I’m with you on my ambivalence regarding swift and I also couldn’t help but notice the lack of thought occurring in OP’s shower.

I think you meant lop, not lob. At least I hope vets aren’t yeeting pet testicles.

More accurately it’s the republicans way of saying that.

Is this post part of a meta trend of making obvious statements as though they were unpopular opinions?

I occasionally listen to a podcast that reviews basically any and all movies that are adapted from comics and they take their name from the exact issue you mentioned, Not Another Origin Story. I guess it shows that even among the people that really enjoy and are passionate about superhero movies constantly redoing the origin is a tired act.

Specialized tools oversells it. A chipped sparkplug will work.

I think it would help if I knew what definition you were using, I’m not sure where the equally likely part comes from. I think there would be a distinction between an omnipotent being being able to do a thing and choosing to do a thing.

An omnipotent god needs, by definition, be equally able and likely to be exceedingly cruel as wellwilling.

How do you figure that?

I think you would be surprised how many people would not only understand but also engage in the same activity.

It doesn’t solve that issue though does it? It lets you continue to use the TV with diminished functionality from what you paid for and agreed to. You’re still acting aggressive while wrong and ignoring parts of the issue. Shocking.

Well you don’t seem to be getting it 100%. You again left out the important context that the TOS changed in a substantial way since what they agreed to when they purchased it. Maybe you should tone your aggression down a smidge if you are going to be wrong.

Are you intentionally ignoring the large chunks of context of the topic being discussed?

That kind of mentality for these issues feels a bit like “find the least uncomfortable position with a boot on your neck. See, no problem.”

Not again? Last time was stonetoss. If you are this disconnected maybe do a quick “is this artist a well known bigot” web search before posting from here on.

As a nerd who was on the internet in the 90s I can assure you that was no filter against idiots.

I think examples of the times that a race swap was the only thing that changed would probably have helped. I agree that without that you are kind of repeating yourself.

That kinda strikes me as backfilling a motive for the studios to fit a preferred view rather than being an actual insight. But supposing that’s true it seems like it supports the point that all the others changes don’t get that kind of response. The other changes aren’t considered pointless or lazy or pandering but the ones that do trigger the bigots, those do fall into that category it seems.

I dunno, I didn’t get much that was tangible about how race swap was a sign of bad writing. While I agree that Miles and Peter are different a great many don’t agree and insist that race swapping spider-man was lazy and pandering.