NYPost is owned by Rupert Murdoch. They have a tendency to report before verifying, with inflammatory headlines, with an obvious ultra-conservative agenda. Were sympathetic to Trump’s election denial . At one point, they decided to dox a full time paramedic for having an only fans, being so out of touch that they didn’t realize the bigger story was that she couldn’t afford to make ends meet.

This doesn’t even scratch the surface. They’re essentially a tabloid for people who like yelling at clouds.

Ahahaha if by dozens you mean 60, 5 dozen, it makes up less than 0.6% of Palestinians killed. 60 people in exchange for thousands of children.

not only are you spamming /c/world@lemmy.world, you have the audacity to post nypost lmao

Again I’m going to need evidence that they are keeping 1 million people hostage from someone other than the people who have killed over 10000 civilians in a month

Does it happen, absolutely.

Do you think it’s not used as justification to indiscriminately fire upon residential or refuges areas? Can you really tell me with a straight face that the US wiped out 1/5 of Korea in the 60s because they were all collateral damage/human shields? Can you also tell me with a straight face that its more likely that Hamas is keeping 1 million people locked inside Northern Gaza, or is it more likely that Gazans realize that if they leave they can never come back. And even if they DO leave, have fun because the Israelis bomb evacuation routes marked as “safe”.

I interpret it that a congresswoman criticizing Biden’s enablement of genocide to get him to stop massacring civilians. This is why people don’t take the democrats seriously. Any pushback equates to hostility. Criticism is shunned and you gotta just eat the vote blue no matter who bull shit.

We will remember that you committed genocide is a threat? They never censured George Santos yet they censure the only Palestinian person? What a joke.

Human shields is the same propaganda they used in Vietnam, Korea, and Iraq. If you want me to believe this human shields rhetoric, show me proof or I’ll chalk it up to another excuse for a free fire zone.

I can’t imagine the level of cognitive dissonance someone needs to justify this slaughter. Probably close to popping a blood vessel in their cranium.

Great, I’m telling you that it goes against my morals. You can effectively vote for whoever you want and I can effectively not vote for either. Are you going to tell me voting third party is a vote for Trump too?

Not saying I am, but voting for someone who enables a genocide goes against my values. If by childish you mean choosing what I want to do with my vote, then sure.

I’m done with lesser evil voting. Pout all you want, but if I don’t believe in the person I’m not voting for them. End of story. Have a nice day.

Yep.

Just wait until you hear that on July 19th 2018, Israel passed the nation-state law which states in it’s basic principles, “The right to exercise national self-determination in the State of Israel is unique to the Jewish people.” Meaning Arabs and Muslims are not entitled to the same rights or freedom as Jewish people.

Biden has not called for a ceasefire. He has called for a humanitarian pause until they can get hostages and foreign nationals out, so they can resume bombing. I’ll continue using my vote as my voice. You are free to do whatever you want.

May not be relevant anymore but Israeli reserve major general Oren Shachor, explained in 2014: “If we kill their families, that will frighten them.”

Hope that clears things up Mr President 🙏

That is your decision and I have nothing against it.

I don’t disagree. Will continue to vote locally, even nationally if the candidates align with my values and will keep voting for third parties. I just cannot justify a lesser evil to myself anymore.

I’ve always found it strange how people gatekeep internet culture. Especially when it’s meaningless in the face of a genocide. I don’t care about this perfect utopia you expected the fediverse to be. I will be firmly against genocide and will say it wherever I see fit.

Thanks you too

I told you my beliefs and I own it. You told me yours and you own it. Is this supposed to be some next level analysis, that I disagree with you? That’s usually how conversations work.