deleted by creator

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

The very same!

I understand the point after you clarified it. You seem to be completely baffled that anyone would interpret it any differently.

1. Questions safety of microplastics

2. Answers question on safety

3. Finally someone not questioning the safety!

I see. Surely you can see how it can be interpreted as I did.

It was in response to me asking about microplastics so it kinda was.

Kind of annoying to say I was “screaming microplastics” when I simply asked if there was more or less of a risk compared to non-addative manufacturing of plastics. You also seem to have resigned to not being worried about microplastics since it is already a problem.

You and another poster brought up “but there are microplastics everywhere!” Yes, and we are learning about them and their problems. I’ve heard about potential issues about synthetic fabrics. I think it is pretty reasonable to ask about the safety, especially when the science on the effects of microplastics is finally entering the forefront.

Is there more/less a risk of using micro plastics with food stuff than traditional plastic?

I would really love to use a 3D printer for all of these home organization tasks but am worried of increasing consumption of micro plastics.

Any totalitarian countries are all about rising to the top and falling out of the window when you get there.

Wait, all of that for just a Boolean true value or is that some sort of logical expression?