Keyword being “shouldn’t”. C++ doesn’t care about that, it just hands you the loaded gun.
- 75 Posts
- 2.37K Comments
Joined 1 year ago
Cake day: September 1st, 2023
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
If an Arch linux user hasn’t told anybody they use it, are they really using it?
103·2 days agoMaybe hosting services in France is not a good idea afterall…
Being a node isn’t an issue. The traffic is encrypted, the destinations are unknown to the nodes themselves, and the traffic does not leave the overlay network (I2P). In TOR, you also have something similar, but the traffic can exit the overlay network but to do so, your node must be an exit node. I2P nodes are internal by default and it’s not that easy to make it an exit node.
You are very safe being a node in I2P.
If there are no logs, there is nothing to give up. There is no law that they have to keep logs as far as I know.
You have to trust that the VPN provider doesn’t store logs. I2P is pretty much trustless besides where the binary comes from, but you can even compile it yourself.
auto isn’t dynamic typing it’s just type inference.
I’m aware, but one of the big arguments I’ve heard about dynamic typing is “I don’t know which type it has when I read the code”. Well, auto looks just like var in that regard.
Lambdas are just a way of defining methods in place. It has nothing to do with callbacks.
Callback definition from wikipedia:
In computer programming, a callback is a function that is stored as data (a reference) and designed to be called by another function – often back to the original abstraction layer.
This is exactly what lambdas are often used for in C++.
C++ continues to be the dumping ground of paradigms and language features. This proposal just aims to add even more to an overloaded language.
C++ programmers mocked languages for being dynamically typed then they introduced
auto, they mocked JS for callback hell and introduced lambdas, they mocked Rust devs for being lowskill C++ devs who can’t manage their own memory and now they are admitting they can’t manage it themselves either.It’s going to be come like the x86 instruction set or windows that is backwards compatible with stuff from 30years ago just accumulating cruft, unable to let go.
The hate is towards the community members that spam “arch btw” and telling new users to install arch.
12·3 days ago- How long did you wait for the router to be back up?
- Have you looked at the logs within the container?
docker compose exec i2p_router tail -F .i2p/wrapper.log
For me, it comes back up after a few seconds.
WARN: There may be another router already running. Waiting a while to be sure... WARN: Old router was not shut down gracefully, deleting /i2p/.i2p/router.ping INFO: No, there wasn't another router already running. Proceeding with startup.
That’s probably for a judge to decide if it ever gets to court.
3·3 days agoI can only hope the ecosystem will very different in 5 years.
You should probably look at the logs. It helps narrow down the issue and provide us also with more information.
Logs are either in the i2p home folder or in the docker logs.
Did they though? I haven’t heard of a single big name studio switching to an opensource game engine.
Hey :) Hope you’re doing well!
That is actually a good question. Probably the consumer protection agency would be a place to report it. There must also be non-profit watchdogs, but I can’t think of any besides NOYB (none of your business) who are all about privacy.
Indeed. I’m not sure what the format is and whether a man in the middle or fake service could be run on the device, which pretends to be google’s attestation service and just responds with a “yep, this device is fine” in the correct format. It may be easier than rewriting an entire app and be applicable to other apps as well.
Can someone start a Signal group? That’s encrypted and safe for sure. You can use usernames and have public groups.
I think it’s more a monopoly attempt. I wonder how the EU will react if someone takes this to court.
Forcing one app store fits the bill of monopolistic action.
It’s not the store that’s the problem. The integrity API is a web API. First the app collects data about your phone locally and then it sends it to google asking “is this phone ‘safe’?”. Google then responds with how safe it believes the phone to be and the app itself makes a decision. The alternative app store is completely out of the loop.
Maybe present what it’s for and why you think it should be used? To me, you just proposed a random tool and just shared a link. Sorry dude, I ain’t reading all that.
Anti Commercial-AI license