That would be wrong in every technical sense. You’re saying that .first()
would skip the 0th item.
First = leftmost.
That would be wrong in every technical sense. You’re saying that .first()
would skip the 0th item.
First = leftmost.
Because you can look it up.
Don’t you use a formatter that fixes whitespace in sloppy writing?
Neofetch has always been stupid and slow
I’d like to add my opinion that git is definitely not the worst offender
What were the limitations they overcame with BitNet, and what are some unresolved issues mentioned in the reprint?
I sniffed and smirked in agreement and joy of camaraderie.
You😆are🤓🤣wrong🤬😡! 💯💯👁️🍑👁️
Not a good first impression (other comments have my thoughts covered) and I think I’ll stick with Firefox.
Unless they impress us by re-writing it in a quality-first language, and make all configuration declarative, and drop support for some cruft. They’re going to have to try something bold and different to impress me, otherwise, this seems like more of the same, and an uphill battle at that.
Yes, indeed, and fuck you too.
Everyone is misrepresented in the two-party system.
Thank you my unbiased friend
But I don’t understand why them being connected makes one dependent on the other, unless half of the supply alone can’t support the workload. What is the “electrical utility level”
Can you please elaborate on the technical details of the failures? What was the hidden dependency?
Both parties.
It’s supposed to be a reply to an existing conversation.
See I don’t think that is wrong either. Technically accurate words are valid substitutes for orthodox ones, especially in a comedic sense.
Friend, people will get offended by anything and everything. Didn’t worry about it. You just be you.
As a native speaker, I approve of your opinion.
There’s another way to think about it which I actually use. Look in the empty bin and say “zero”, then move an apple and say “one”.