The Case of the Golden Idol

Can confirm as well, this game is fantastic.

multiplayer

Yeah, not interested in multiplayer at all.

And by “fighting,” I meant something in the souls-like/ARPG realm, as in player skill is more important than stats or equipment. Perhaps my favorite example here is Ys, which is an ARPG with minimal loot and difficult boss fights (favorites are Ys 1 and Ys Origin). A less good, but more indie example is Gurumin.

I don’t like actual fighting games, like Street Fighter or Tekken, outside of nostalgia (I played a lot of Street Fighter II as a kid, and my SO and I played Soul Caliber when we first met). I play games to make it to the end, not practice over and over to compete with others. I used to like this, but I honestly don’t have the time to truly be competitive.

Yeah, I don’t understand why JBOD with a decent chipset is so hard to find. I really don’t expect much from it, I just want to slide some drives in and have everything run consistently for a few months at a time. I’ll power cycle periodically to apply updates, so I’m not looking for 24/7/365 operation or anything.

FWIW, Level1Techs seems to recommend MediaSonic (timestamp is where he talks about reliability), but doesn’t give it a ringing endorsement. And that was one of the better ones he’s seen…

After a bunch of research, what I’ve found is:

• okay chipset, but garbage build quality (no dampening for drives, no hot-swap, etc)
• fancy controller that doesn’t support JBOD - non-starter for me, I don’t want anything to do with hw controllers
• expensive - at a certain point, I’ll just keep my oversized ATX case that does the job

Now I’m looking for compact cases that support 5 drives, like this one (a little too cheap perhaps?) or this one. It just seems reliable 4-5 bay USB-C enclosures just aren’t that popular.

Makes sense for single drives, but if I go with USB, it’ll be something like this with multiple bays, which will almost certainly support UASP. I also don’t want a hardware RAID controller because I’d much rather my BTRFS filesystem handle the individual drives than rely on some controller to not corrupt my data.

The problem, however, is that a lot of these enclosures use really crappy components. Sometimes drives will drop off for no reason and the entire unit will need to be power cycled. They also tend to require a separate power supply, which is also annoying. But if there’s a super high quality one for pretty cheap, the entire package (mini PC + enclosure) is probably smaller than pretty much any equivalent case. So I’m interested, I just haven’t found a good fit.

Exactly! My code has a handful of “expect()” calls in it, and each one self-documents why it’s okay. It’s like a comment, but it appears in logs if it ever triggers.

I would weigh a don’t want the same as want least. I just had a couple situations where two options were both “don’t want,” and I wish I could have communicated that instead of picking one to be in the middle. I don’t think the same should be true of “want most” though, I should be forced to rank those. But for two things I really don’t care about, ordering doesn’t convey any extra useful information.

Yeah, that’s what I’m worried about. Fortunately, the previous owner seemed obsessed with phone and coax jacks, so almost every room has at least one of them. I could just run ethernet over those jacks, but I might be able to attach a string to them to pull in a proper ethernet cable. Then again, maybe I’ll just end up needing to drill new holes, idk.

I’m just not looking forward to doing it is all.

Exactly. If there’s only one thing I could bring from Rust into another language, it would be Mutexes. It’s so nice to guarantee safe access to data.

I kind of disagree here. .lock() has the following behavior:

• panic() if the lock is already held by this thread - should never happen
• error - if the current lock holder paniced

The second case is incredibly rare, so it’s one of the few cases where I think .unwrap() makes sense in production code. But it should be an option to handle it in robust code that should never go down. This is rare, but it’s not so rare that we should force all locks to exist in a context where we can recover from panics.

.try_unlock() should never exist because there should only be one way to release a lock: drop(). Having a way to maybe unlock a mutex adds a ton of issues. If we assume this was a typo, .try_lock() absolutely exists, and it’s for a non-blocking lock.

Agreed, the survey was pretty decent. My biggest complaint, however, was that there wasn’t an option for “don’t want,” only “want least.” Sometimes I got three options that I actually do want, and sometimes I got two that I definitely don’t want, and I think it would be useful to communicate that.

I’m surprised “Customizable UI” was so high, I’m pretty sure I was one of those who marked it down as “want least.” I guess it’s cool, but I prefer the browser to get out of my way instead of being something I spend time messing with.

That said, I’m happy and not particularly surprised that AI didn’t show up anywhere in the top-10.

But honestly, you shouldn’t need to do this, you can just use LetsEncrypt to get a real cert. Here’s what I do:

1. route external traffic to your devices - I use a VPS w/ a VPN because I’m behind CGNAT, but if you have a publicly routable address, you can probably just use your router
2. configure LetsEncrypt for your services
3. configure the DNS your router provides to swap the public IP (i.e. the one for your VPS if you have it) to your LAN address, and have all of your devices use that DNS name

Boom, you get all the benefits of a proper TLS setup, along with all of the benefits of local traffic. You can even turn off external access to the services between cert renewals.

Yeah, I might end up getting one for that. My current TV doesn’t have ads, but does have enough smart features to have a Jellyfin app, so I’m good for now. But my SO wants a bigger TV, so that may end up being sooner than later.

Tactical Breach Wizards and Into the Breach

I’ve played Into the Breach, but not Tactical Breach Wizards, adding it to the list. :)

Platformers: Celeste, Horace, Dustforce and Little Nightmares

Loved Little Nightmares, haven’t played the others. Thanks!

Guacamelee

I’ve definitely heard of it, but never got around to it. Thanks for the reminder.

Wadjet Eye Games

Huh, I haven’t played any of those, I’ll add a couple and probably end up playing all of them. Thanks!

Story aka Walking Simulators

Firewatch and Jazzpunk are on the list, I have The Vanishing of Ethan Carter, but the others aren’t.

These are some fantastic recommendations, thanks!!

Exactly. Just like any other kind of proselytizing, it’s better to just live by example and answer questions as they come. For example:

• personal finance - manage finances properly, and people will notice that you’re not stressed about money
• religion/philosophy - live a worthwhile life and demonstrate the value it brings to your life
• products - use them and mention them when relevant (e.g. my coworker loves their Remarkable and shills it at every opportunity)

People aren’t going to change their behavior because you’re pushing something on them, they’ll change their behavior if they see something they want more than what they have. I think more people should self-host, but I don’t get anything from others switching, nor do I have much control over them deciding to switch.

Eh, I haven’t convinced anyone, but I have gotten questions from my brothers about it. They don’t come over often, but I’ve done a lot of work on my self-hosted setup, so I’ll probably show it off at our next reunion (next summer).

My brothers both want to host video, and they’ve asked about ripping DVDs/Blurays. I’ve now finished ripping my entire collection (took a few weeks), so now I’m more well-equipped to answer questions.

Yeah, I’d need to run cable if I moved my machines to a closet, and I’m putting that off. I do plan to do that though, so maybe someday. :)

Yup, started with 0 and working my way through.

Some genres I especially like:

• puzzles - Return of the Obra Dinn, Manifold Garden, etc
• platformers - absolutely loved INSIDE and LIMBO, currently enjoying A Hat in Time, loved Psychonauts (Psychonauts 2 is on the list, but it’s not really “indie” anymore), little nightmares
• metroidvanias - Blue Fire, Hollow Knight, etc
• point and click - Darkside Detective, Deponia, etc
• fighting/souls-like - Furi, Titan Souls
• story - What Remains of Edith Finch
• other - Recettear, Grand Mountain Adventure, Human Resource Machine

Basically, if it has really good gameplay or story, I’ll probably like it.

It’s probably more interesting to point out what I tend to not like:

• roguelikes
• city builders - I like high quality builders like Cities: Skylines, but indies tend to not have the budget
• rhythm
• stealth
• shooters - very samey; I’d rather play AAA, such as Doom

But then again, there’s an exception to each of these (e.g. I loved Slay the Spire and Black Mesa). So honestly, I’d probably enjoy anything that really stands out as being unique or interesting.

I’m more interested in multi-bay enclosures, but as you said, the chipsets tend to be kinda crappy. And that’s what makes me hesitate to use these mini PCs, my use-case is for a NAS, but these enclosures are kind of expensive and seem to have pretty poor components.

So for now, I’m using larger cases to hold the drives. But it takes up a lot of desk space, so these mini PCs are very attractive, if I can get a compact external enclosure to work.

TerraMaster, Orico

I honestly have never used either of these, yet they show up at a lot of retailers.

ASUS is a bit sketchy these days IMO, so I try to avoid them.

I’ve heard good things about Proxmox, but I have no direct experience with it. That would be a separate box that manages the VMs and everything, and it has a remote GUI option (webpage I think?).

If you want something on an existing box, just use KVM directly, or a simple frontend like GNOME boxes. I don’t know about remote configuration, but once it’s set up, do you really need to check in on things remotely? KVM will do hardware acceleration (definitely CPU acceleration, GPU if you configure it properly), and it has no GUI by default.