deleted by creator

Ah, thank you. It’s been a while since I had to work with Android.

Material Design is still modern? I thought Google had revised that again.

(Using only Apple devices, I wonder if I should make an Apple-like interface now…)

That blog is hard to read on a desktop computer in my opinion. But hey, “it looks cool”, at least…

The WTFPL is risky in certain jurisdictions, as it does not have a NO WARRANTY clause.

Wiser alternative:

Do whatever you like with the original work, just don’t be a dick.

Mullvad and Perfect Privacy won’t need your bank details though.

TL;DR: the NATO is our enemy.

Some yes, some no. Zürich works quite well.

Thank you! :-)

The content posted here has no obvious license. I wonder if an administrator could just put any license of his choice on your posts.

I wonder why I don’t pay for Lemmy.

bsky-social-yfjde-fanxw first one gets it

Made by Mozilla Corporation, an US company. Just saying.

Again, I’m talking about the server part here, and there is a lot preventing a server to be both a web and a mail server.

You understand that web servers (listening on a web server port) and mail servers (listening on one or more mail server ports, possibly on the same computer) are entirely different technologies?

JMAP sounds interesting indeed, but as far as I understand, there is an underwhelming number of clients that speak it?

A website is the response a web server sends on a web port to a web browser. SMTP on port 80/443 won’t work well, but please try.

If you try it, report back. ;-) My current setup is mostly OpenSMTPD & Dovecot, but I’m open for good reasons to move away.

Websites do not have the functionality to connect to mail servers. These are different protocols.

For mail server infrastructure, Stalwart is said to be pretty good. I haven’t had a chance to try it yet.