I think I’m correctly interpreting the effective meaning of the comic. The effective meaning takes precedent over the intended meaning. Now that you know my view, do you think everyone’s response to my take is justified? It’s pretty demoralizing how readily everyone assumes the least charitable interpretation of my words when there is any level of ambiguity. Nobody ever asks me to clarify. It’s just a fucking dogpile right out the gate because this whole charade of “discourse” is a dopamine-seeking frenzy dressed up as intellectualism.

My point is that I find it disgusting how society doesn’t seem to give a shit about homeless men but they do care about homeless women and children. Homeless women and children seem to be the main focus for most people seeing as there are so many more resources only available to homeless women and children than there are to homeless men despite the fact that the VAST majority are adult men. Society has a sickening lack of sympathy for homeless men, to the point where you can’t get some people to care about the homelessness crisis in the slightest until you inform them that some homeless people are women and children. This comic is a demonstration of that phenomenon. The comic essentially says “actually, you should care about homelessness because they aren’t all just men”

Christ, you actually can’t find a way to communicate without patronizing. I literally do not care what you have to say about my character or personality or whatever, it’s got very little to do with the actual substance of my comment.

I meant your actual point. I’m skipping the dumb internet fight bits. The third sentence in your message. Who said anything about “taking advantage of the system” because I surely did not.

I know my role. Someone’s gotta do it.

Don’t take this the wrong way, but I’m not sure what your point is. Can you rephrase and/or elaborate please?

Who’s offended?

Just what you to know that not everything is a personal attack directly at you.

Surely you can find a way to communicate this without being patronizing…

Honestly this cartoon fucking sucks. Something like 80% of homeless people are adult men like the first panel. The three other panels essentially serve the message “Did you know some homeless people are women and children??? Do you care NOW?”

I can’t chill ever

It’s a curse

https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Solid_state_drive/NVMe

Namespaces are the construct in NVMe technology that hold user data. An NVMe controller can have multiple namespaces attached to it. Most NVMe SSDs today just use a single namespace, but multi-tenant applications, virtualization and security have use cases for multiple namespaces.

  device v
/dev/nvme0n1p1 < partition
namespace  ^

There are two types of people: Those who are able to identify gaps in their knowledge and actively seek to fill them… and whatever this meme is.

Just copy your nix config over and build again. Non-issue. What? You don’t have a backup? You deserved it then.

this answer is synonymous with “nothing”

what have you done for your community lately?

Say it with me everyone, INDICES

Peace, love, unprotected sex with strangers, rampant drug abuse, phony pseudo-religion, etc. Which parts were controversial again?

I saw that actually. Almost fooled me until I saw they had about 10 reviews each.

I don’t really think you need to worry about inanimate objects seeing as they haven’t been made for good or evil specifically. On the other hand, if you write software that decides who lives or dies, you have a gigantic responsibility and the blood of any accident is on your hands

I was making a joke

Do you work for the North Korean government or something OP? Why discourage people from keeping their systems secure?