I can’t believe you would trample on my freedom to extinct an animal like that.

I’m not sure I understand how that applies here or changes what I posted.

I used to as well until I looked into it, which is why I now know way, way more than anyone really needs to (there is… a lot.) Anyway, figured I’d explain just in case. You didn’t seem like you had bad intentions, so thanks for being understanding.

A furry is someone that identifies with anthropomorphic animal characters (or sometimes just animal characteristics). No dressing up required. Now, a lot of the people that go to cons tend to have more money, so you will see more fursuits and such, but most furries do not dress up.

You are right, but a lot of the roots of furry criticism do tend to be queerphobic in origin. It’s just something to recognize.

I’m using kink in a pretty generic way because a lot of the criticisms of furries relate to sex (e.g. beastiality or pedophilia), and thus any depiction of kink (like bondage gear) is used to demonize them that it’s a fetish (and one that is coming for your children.)

There is a significantly higher proportion of LGBTQ+ representation within the furry community than the general populace, and it makes sense why. Fursonas are another way to explore sexual and gender identities in a safe way, and furry communities tend to be pretty accepting places.

This is just my opinion, but I see kink in the furry community criticized the same way I see kink at Pride events criticized.

Currently, my taxes go into destroying homeless encampments and arresting them, so we could probably use that money for housing and feeding them instead.

Feed and house them, can you not read?

You are making a silly argument that is flawed. The Witcher includes sexual themes because the book it is based on also includes these themes.

BG3 includes optional romantic themes because the game it is based on can include optional romantic themes. The game is about your involvement in the story, about how you navigate the world and its people because it attempts to mimic DnD. You can do a lot of “I seduce the dragon” and BG3 was designed to be fairly accomodating to a variety of tables.

To suggest the game would be better if it contained no romance when you haven’t played it is… bizarre? Especially with it being optional. But, that is perhaps the epitome of my argument. A lot of content in BG3 is optional. To remove any of it would be to make a game about options lesser.

I think romance is included in a lot of stories because it is a very common component in life. We have so many experiences around love, and exploring that in a fictional environment at the same time we do battle against demons is fun for many people.

TTRPGs cater to you choosing your own story. To remove the romance from this story is to say that some choices in this story cannot be made.

Also, there’s mods to remove the romance. It would be a loss to have them gone at the onset.

I disagree on pretty much every point, but I personally don’t see the problem you’re having with the game. If you don’t like the nudity, that is optional (as in, there is an option for it.) If you’re complaining about the romance, that’s like an entire genre of stories. Heck, softcore porn is also a genre of stories that is exceptionally popular. So, why would removing it for you make up for the loss of potential customers that were gained from it being there, especially since you bought it with it there anyway? Idk, seems like you disproved your own point.

Is it actually incorrect? I don’t think it’s necessarily wrong, but it just sounds bizarre or Shakespearean if you use it when it’s not an auxiliary verb.

“I’ve no need for that.” is a perfectly cromulent sentence.

Make sure you take your dog’s shoes off, too.

No, he did. He just didn’t die houseless :(

I’m not trans, but I do know how to read medical studies that all disagree with you. I suppose reading isn’t a specialty of yours, or you wouldn’t add good day to the end of your posts while parroting bigoted talking points.

Anyway, you are correct that you are a transphobe, so I’m glad you admit it. That is always the first step.

Have a good day.

You are confidently explaining being trans wrong to someone who literally explained trans completely correct, and you look incredibly silly.

Being trans is not exclusively the opposite of your genetic sex. Being trans is not identifying as your assigned gender at birth. This includes non-binary people, and also doesn’t exclude intersex people, who wouldn’t fit into your definition, since the gender binary doesn’t have an apt comparison, especially because we assign genders based on our genitals (which, again, may not correlate to our genetic sex!)

The point is that gender is technically kinda arbitrary, and it affects more things beyond one of each of these can make a baby.

Technically, he did get the most votes once. It’s just that electoral votes aren’t representative of the popular vote, which he has never gotten because he is an unlikeable wannabe dictator.

If you expect us to take responsibility for our actions, then we’d have to have real solutions, and it’s just easier to complain about things, plus we’d have to arrest a looooooot of war criminals.

Fuck off, liar. Transgender ban in the military against the advice of generals in easily the most obvious one.

The best you could say is that he let several states set up ways to systematically genocide LGBT people, (cough cough Don’t Say Gay) but he also actively fought to take away several of their rights, so that would still be a mischaracterization.

Trump wouldn’t give a shit if every LGBT person on earth was dead, he’d just find new minorities to go after.

Are you suggesting it is okay to kill civilians being used as human shields?