They’ll obviously die of poverty the first week. Anyone else want to suffer this badly? /s

        • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          If you have no insurance, sure. If you have even crappy insurance and max out both your in network and out of network out of pocket maximums, you are talking tens of thousands, not hundreds.

          Source: Just did a bunch of worst case scenario comparisons between options insurance options for my wife and I.

          Edit: There is a caveat here, I didnt consider originally. If you have insurance that ONLY covers in-network, then yeah… you can get fucked real hard in an emergency medical situation that puts you out of network. Dont get that kind of insurance, people. No amount of cost savings is worth that risk.

          • Pickle_Jr@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            This is only true if the insurance decides if your treatment or received health care is covered. If you happen to need something that the insurance just outright will not cover, then you foot the bill.

            • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              Fair point. Generally, emergency minimally life saving care is covered by default. That’s the point of getting insurance. I’m sure there’s many examples of that failing to hold true, though.

      • glimse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t think people with that kind of wealth are the enemy, honestly. A million dollars ain’t shit anymore

        And if they’re asking how to survive, you cropped that part out of the screenshot

          • glimse@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            1 year ago

            I think you took a screenshot without the relevant detail you want me to get mad about…

            You thought the body was obvious from the truncated headline? Seriously.

          • zoomzoom@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            The partial headline certainly does suggest they are bragging about their wealth. The “only” is on their debt (Mortgage). If it were about not having enough your would imagine it would be written as “and I STILL owe xxx on my house” and “only have xx in savings”

      • Gigan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’ll appreciate, that savings account won’t.

        It depends, high yield savings accounts are getting >5% interest right now. Which could be higher than his mortgage rate.

  • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    3x? Must not be Wisconsin. Max unemployment here is $370 a week, making 5k 13.5x unemployment.

    Edit: I need sleep, read minimum wage as unemployment for some reason.

    • Pistcow@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      $1000/week in Washington state. Was nice for 6 months not having to worry. Too bad it took 13 months for me to get a job.

      • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Wisconsin is literally the worst state when it comes to unemployment. Id be dropping from near $7k a month to $1.5k. Without savings I’d be homeless in a matter of months.

        • Pistcow@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Alabama at $275 for 14 weeks seems to be the low mark. Great safety net guys!

          • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I don’t understand two things honestly. The first is why can’t they federalize unemployment, and the second is why isn’t it paid out at a set percentage of your average income over x number of years.

            It’s crazy to me that someone who has paid into the system at a higher rate doesn’t have the same level of protection, percentage wise, as someone who has paid in less.

            It would be very different if people had a set cost of living, but that just isn’t the case. 275 can be an amount you can live on, however uncomfortably, until you find a job, or it can be… homelessness in a matter of months.

            Crazy town.

  • xia@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Seems like you could pay off your mortgage with a chunk of your savings and be better off. Assuming the APR of your debt is more than your savings.