Health experts say axing plan to block sales of tobacco products to next generation will cost thousands of lives

  • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    82
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    11 months ago

    This headline SCREAMS ‘conservative’:

    • bad for people
    • bad for healthcare
    • generate tax cuts … for the wealthy
    • InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 months ago

      But think of the savings. Early death means budget surplus from hospice saved. /s

      Can someone that still has a twitter ask Dan Patrick to take one for the economy here?

    • kaffiene@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      No surprise that it’s from an anti woke virtue signalling bunch of reactionary conservatives, then

      • livus@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        @Amazinghorse that’s not really true. It won’t affect the bottom tax bracket. National have been pitching it as a tax cut for “middle income earners”.

        I just went and played around with their tax calculator and low income earners get almost nothing compared to wealthier people.

        • Amazinghorse@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          From memory minimum wage earners get something like $25 per week, which I know isn’t much. Middle income earners ($120k+ combined) get $120 per fortnight back. People earning over $80k don’t get any additional cuts.

          Their policy specifically states tax cuts for the bottom 3 brackets. I don’t know why the calculator isn’t showing any cuts for min wage.

              • kaffiene@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                You said they’re providing tax cuts for the bottom 3 brackets when the reality is that that don’t make a jot of difference for anyone but that rich. I don’t take an issue with your assertion that that the tax cuts exist, i take exception to you implying that it especially targets the lowest brackets

    • quindraco@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      25
      ·
      11 months ago

      So it’s conservative to refuse to ban tobacco? Do you agree with the general consensus that it’s also conservative to ban marijuana? How do you square those two attitudes, if so?

      • dumpsterlid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        11 months ago

        Tobacco causes mass amounts of death and warps entire societies and economies from killing so many older people. Also, massive tobacco companies break any law they want virtually and have for the entirety of their existence as massive corporations marketed cigarettes to kids.

        So yes, I consider it conservative to refuse to ban tobacco and see no conflict with marijuana because marijuana doesn’t cause mass amounts of death and suffering (and before you say it does, give me proof).

        • qyron@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          What is concerning about spliff is the tendency to facilitate descent into abnormal mental states.

          I enjoy good relations with a few healthcare professionals and the general consensus is, at this point, spliff has more potential benefits to explore than bad effects, so it makes sense to explore it, never overlooking the continuous use has been linked with some serious mental inbalances and even some physical syndromes.

          Just a few days ago, here, on Lemmy, there was a lemming talking about a strange condition where continuous use over decades can trigger extremer pain and discomfort episodes, due to deposit of substances on fat tissue.

          Tobacco is a proven killer, yes, but who knows what weird side effets we may be yet to discover connected with mary jane.

          • dumpsterlid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            11 months ago

            Tobacco is a proven killer, yes, but who knows what weird side effets we may be yet to discover connected with mary jane.

            I am sure there are weird effects to uncover with modern science, but it isn’t like people just started smoking weed and nobody knows what happens to people who smoke weed their whole lives… and the consequences are quite clearly a universe away from alcohol and tobacco.

            • qyron@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              11 months ago

              I don’t know.

              Not being a spliff smoker, I won’t comment.

              Even tobacco can have medical use: I worked with a person that smoked to increase blood pressure, under medical advice.

              Wine and even whisky have been linked with having benefitial effects on cardiac function, when drank in moderation.

              In my understanding, the biggest issue is the way these substances are used and advertised. The notion of moderation is completely absent.

      • livus@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        @quindraco in the New Zealand context yes it’s extremely conservative. This government is a lot more conservative than previous right-wing govts.

        The “smokefree” policies were created by the Maori Party, whose constituency is disproportionately harmed by smoking.

        If marijuana was killing thousands of Maori they would probably have wanted to but it isn’t.

      • WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        It’s conservative to bend over and spread `em for the benefit of the owning class at the expense of everyone else - chiefly the workers those politicians claim to represent.

        Others have pointed out the gaping differences in the health outcomes (including the burden that places on the healthcare system), addiction rates, etc.