• xxkickassjackxx@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Is it illegal to burn bibles, Torahs, and other religious texts? If not I don’t see why any one religious belief should get a pass.

  • HenriVolney@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    A book is not a person. A book can not be discriminated against. Democracies do not recognize the blasphemy as a crime. Theocracies do.

    • pinwurm@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Well, by that logic, Switzerland isn’t a democracy. The country that decides pretty much everything on referendum.

      And Ireland only became a democracy 3 years ago.

      For what it’s worth, Blasphemy laws can be compatible with democracy. Democracy is only about fair elections and rule of the people. If the people want blasphemy laws, that’s still democracy.

      Freedom is a spectrum - and blasphemy laws just make a country less free. Not necessarily less Democratic.

      • HenriVolney@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I stand my point. Every law restructs freedom one way or another. That is their purpouse so that people can live together peacefully. Blasphemy laws are not the same, they restrict what people can say or do about concepts and beliefs. A democracy where fantasy books have equal rights as people is a democracy by name.

      • rjs001@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Switzerland isn’t a democracy. It’s a dictatorship of the bourgeois and a country that the bourgeois control can never be democratic

    • HornyOnMain🏳️‍⚧️@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      you know, it’s almost as if burning the religious texts of a minority group implies some general sentiment towards the minority group itself 🤔

    • Lenins2ndCat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      That’s an absolutely absurd thing to say. Hate crimes absolutely include acts against symbols and texts of a group. Go outside and burn some lgbt flags in the street in front of cameras or police anywhere here western EU and see how that turns out for you in court.

      Burning religious texts is absolutely 100% a hate crime against followers of that religion and frankly defending that makes you a hateful bigot.

      • HenriVolney@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Thank you for your praise! I see that you belong to the group of people who wake up every morning looking for a reason to get offended. Go in peace with your beliefs and let me piss on holly books.

      • Zippy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        You won’t be charged for burning flags. With the exception that the burn itself might be illegal.

          • Zippy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Generally absent of other crimes, it would be pretty hard to be charged.

            https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-burning-pride-flag-idUSL1N37N1L5

            While I would find burning a flag distasteful, I believe it is more important to have free speech. Burn a Bible or burn a flag, fine. Steal the flag and/or call for the death or violence along with that, now you have a problem.

            And I would rather live in a society that isn’t draconian even if I have to allow those with opinions I don’t agree with.

            • Lenins2ndCat@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Imagine calling hate directed against lgbt people “free speech” go fuck yourself. Fuck your free speech. Your right to speech ends at precisely the point it oppresses marginalised groups. There is no scenario where you can perform this act and not be committing and inciting hate against these groups. Eat shit homophobe.

              • Zippy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                1 year ago

                Relax dude. I have lgbt friends. I simply prefer to live in countries that provides protection to all groups while balancing that with free speech. But I certainly understand the countries that have cracked down the hardest on free speech are also often the countries that have made many of these groups illegal. Sometimes making the punishments death.

                This I really have problems with people like you that want to go backwards and encourage government to create overreaching laws. Laws that could make lgbt lifestyles illegal.

                • Lenins2ndCat@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Fuck off. Stop responding to me. In the street you’d get your head caved in for saying this shit over here. Deservedly so.

  • Lenins2ndCat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I hope the liberals just blatantly doing racism in this thread in response to this fact get banned.

    Also now apparently they’re all in favour of book burning. Scratch a liberal and a fascist bleeds.

  • albigu@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    To all weirdos thinking that the UK of all countries cares about free speech, have a read. It’s already silly when you do this for the USA, worse yet abroad.

  • kimpilled@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Putting people is camps is worse than burning some books.

    Edit: not even burning them, just ALLOWING people to burn them. In the same way we also let people burn flags. Because that’s speech.

    • Lenins2ndCat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Putting people is camps is worse than burning some books.

      Good job America isn’t doing that on the border or in blacksites around the world!

      • kimpilled@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        You’re right. It’s a good thing I’m not trying to explicitly deflect from my country’s sin by complaining about China letting people burn books!

        Own your shit. When a nation does bad shit, call it out. Even if they’re in your “camp”. Don’t pull this “yeah but-“ fuck fuck games. This post is saying “well it’s okay that China put Muslims in camps because the West allows book burning.” Fuck off with that.

        • Lenins2ndCat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I do. Except there’s several problems with this point.

          The first is that this topic is so fundamentally out of date now that it’s embarrassing. These all closed at the end of 2019. Nearly 4 fucking years ago.

          The second is that they were education centres, mandatory yes and I’m quite sure some didn’t want to be there, but “camps” is absurd.

          The third is that you don’t let people go home on the weekends when imprisoning them.

          The issue is that people like yourself don’t actually know any of this, you repeat nonsense spoken by other people that repeat nonsense and never do one iota of investigation to discover the truth. There is a great deal of information available about what these were, what they were in response to (huge terrorism problem pouring in from radical islamic elements in afghanistan) and evidence that the US was involved in it. But again you don’t actually want to learn anything so what’s the fucking point? You’ve had 5 fucking years of this shit already and you’ve managed to avoid actually learning any of these details so why should I think you’re willing to engage in it in good faith and learn now?

          Was it hugely authoritarian? Fuck yeah it was. But the western response to islamic terrorism is a military response, I actually prefer the lack of loss of life in the Chinese approach, and so does the entire Muslim world.

          If you actually want to engage and maybe learn anything about this then I’m willing and able to go into everything about it with citations and detail. Let’s do it, just ask. But I don’t believe that you are.

          • kimpilled@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I guess the Nazi camps were fine because they’re closed now?

            And I guess “because terrorism” is a good excuse now? I mean, the US has done all kinds of fucked up shit that’s okay by that reasoning. If we had put all Saudis in reeducation camps after 9/11, you would (rightly!) call us fascists, and I’d be on your side!

            Edit: that’s not even the “entire Muslim world”, and you know better than to use the boot of governments as a representation of the people.

            • Lenins2ndCat@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I guess the Nazi camps were fine because they’re closed now?

              Christ you are heavily proving my point about not wanting to engage in good faith. Nazi camps served the purpose of extermination, the chinese reeducation centres did no such thing. They opened, performed their job teaching language and key skills to the section of the population that were deemed “at risk” of being susceptible to the islamic extremism, and then they closed.

              And I guess “because terrorism” is a good excuse now? I mean, the US has done all kinds of fucked up shit that’s okay by that reasoning. If we had put all Saudis in reeducation camps after 9/11, you would (rightly!) call us fascists, and I’d be on your side!

              As good an excuse as any for such a complicated matter. Let’s try a thought experiment.

              Let’s say, in YOUR country, that a religious group on a border territory is actively engaging in terrorism. Two to four times per a month mass shooting and bombings are occurring. I will try to provide some perspective on this, but my list will not include everything, I don’t have an existing list of events that is exhaustive and I hope you can understand that searches for anything about Xinjiang and China are completely polluted by utter garbage from the media to the point that searching for this shit is quite difficult now. With that said I think I can cover enough to make it visible how serious things were getting at the start of crackdowns.

              January 2014, 11 militants dead in attempt to cross Kyrgyzstan border gone wrong

              March 2014 Multiple attackers with knives. 29 dead at a train station. 137 injured

              April 2014 7 killed in shootout attempting to cross the border with weapons.

              April 2014 (2 weeks later) Bombing and knife attack at railway station in Xinjiang. 3 killed, 79 injured.

              May 2014 A few weeks later, 2 car bombings on markets, killed 43, injured 90

              June 2014 Quieter month, China sentence 9 to death and 81 more to prison for involvement in organising some of the previous attacks

              July 2014 37 killed by gang with knives and axes in Xinjiang

              September 2014 50 killed in series of multiple attacks (archive link for RFA fed written articles, unfortunately the best I can find with the shit way google works)

              October 2014 22 farmers killed in attack (this article also talks about some other attacks 2 days beforehand, gives some idea of what kind of things I’ve missed or not been able to find dedicated articles for, this stuff was easier to follow in real-time than it is to research now)

              November 2014 15 killed in another attack


              This is far from exhaustive. This is a mentally exhausting topic to research and I hope you’ll forgive me for not really going the full length to show just how fucking bad things were, re-reading about each of these is upsetting, they are all horrible events. Consider these some of the big ones, the easiest to find in each month, but there were many more peppered in between them.

              Now, back to the thought experiment - this is happening in YOUR country. What do you do to stop it? It is increasing, and a foreign adversary is actively involved in your neighbouring country over the border using their intelligence agencies to make it worse, they are trying to pour this far right terrorism over the border to cause a crisis in your country that can be exploited. You should watch Colonel Lawrence Wilkerson, Chief of Staff to the Secretary of State at the time, talk about doing just that from 20:53 to 23:12 (just 2 minutes).. Keep in mind that he said this BEFORE the huge media explosion about this topic, a full year before China actually opened anything, this talk is from August 2018, several months before the narrative about Uighur camps started in 2019.

              Edit: that’s not even the “entire Muslim world”, and you know better than to use the boot of governments as a representation of the people.

              The people support it. You should try actually speaking to anyone from muslim countries about whether they like China or the west. The problem is that you do not, you only listen to white western media and white western liberals. You are a nationalist, an american/western empire nationalist. You do not listen to or engage with anything outside the “international community” (Canada/America/EU/Australia grouping of America and the empire’s vassals). You make claims about “the people” while blatantly having no idea what the people in those countries believe because you have never spoken to anyone from them. When’s the last time you spoke to an Iraqi currently living in Iraq? Or anyone currently living in India? Saudi? Iran? Any fucking where? I speak to people in all of them regularly. Through party activities and because I make the conscious EFFORT to seek information outside the western media bubble and western left because if you do not you end up completely and utterly brainwormed.

              So anyway, side-rant over and back to the topic at hand. This terrorism is what caused China to go into a mega crackdown on the region. Roadblocks, mass surveillance and police-state shit. Fuck loads of people were dying and the CIA working to pour these islamic fundamentalist separatists over the border from Afghanistan was genuinely causing an enormous issue.

              What followed this was several years of increasing their infrastructure to crack down on the region very hard. Followed by the final re-education program that involved some 1-2 million people undergoing the compulsory education programs 5 days per week (allowed to go home on weekends).

              This is what put a stop to the violence, and it was this final program that led to America no longer having any purpose for being in Afghanistan anymore, their ability to stoke extremism in the region had finally been completely eliminated. It took considerable time to build up to that though, the important year that began the process was the enormous violence of 2014.

              Back to that thought experiment. Tell me, if this was happening in your country - What would you have done?

              EDIT: Anyone seeking more info can learn here.

                • Hexadecimalkink@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Has the USA owned Chile, Afghanistan, Iraq, Philippines, Indonesia, Vietnam, Cambodia, Marshall Islands, Honduras, Haiti, black prison labour, I could go on if you want…?

    • masquenox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Putting people is camps is worse than burning some books.

      Yeah it’s not like the west launched brutal invasions and occupations of Muslim-majority nations in the middle-east in the past two decades or anything…

      That would be embarrasing for your argument, huh?

      • kimpilled@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        You’re right. It’s a good thing I’m not trying to explicitly deflect from my country’s sin by complaining about China letting people burn books!

        Own your shit. When a nation does bad shit, call it out. Even if they’re in your “camp”. Don’t pull this “yeah but-“ fuck fuck games. This post is saying “well it’s okay that China put Muslims in camps because the West allows book burning.” Fuck off with that.

          • kimpilled@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Arguing against that stupid invasion. Fucking obviously. What are you doing other than making excuses?

            • masquenox@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yeah… strange that I can’t find a USian that supported the empire’s wars these days - just like it’s next-to-impossible to find a white South African that supported Apartheid.

              It’s all very… suspicious.

              • kimpilled@infosec.pub
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Dunno what to tell ya bruh 🤷 I was in high school civics telling them it was fuckin dumb and on Warcraft 3 forums doing the same. The fact that it was so stupid and the republicans disavowed it make everyone pretend they were always against it.

                Now what’s your stance on PRC authoritarianism against ethnic and religious minorities?

  • Hexadecimalkink@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why am I not surprised? The G7 loves to use international law maliciously about out of the spirit of the law.

  • maporita@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Those are countries that care about free speech. They would also allow burning the bible or the Torah … it’s not just the Koran. The inference in the headline is flawed.

  • fubo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is off-topic for this forum, which only allows links to actual news sources.

    • 133arc585@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Al-Jazeera is an “actual news source”. It’s also just a visualization of data directly from the UN HRC vote.

      This should have been a link to the Al-Jazeera article itself instead of just the image that came from it though.