This is the definition I am using:

a system, organization, or society in which people are chosen and moved into positions of success, power, and influence on the basis of their demonstrated abilities and merit.

  • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    9 months ago

    I believe in a theoretical meritocracy but I think there are some pitfalls. We have a market that’s very efficient at rewarding incredibly unproductive people. The correlation between money and skill in the modern world just… isn’t. So we’d really need a better evaluation system… if we had that I think it’d be achievable.

    Love the idea, though.

    • quotheraven404@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      I agree, there would have to be measures in place to prevent the “promote to the level of incompetence” style of meritocracy that is prevalent already. There needs to be a system of recognizing that the person in any given position has the skills and abilities that make them awesome at that specific job, and rewarding them appropriately without requiring them to justify it by taking on tasks that they’re not suited for.

      The idea that workers should always be gunning for a promotion is one of the worst parts of what people think a meritocracy is. But how else do you determine how much they should be paid?

      • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Hell, I only consented to management because the company stopped listening to frontline developers. We’ve got a serious problem in the west with title fixation.