• flipthetube@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago
    1. These people have to deal with the public. People suck, so burnout happens pretty quickly.

    2. Most people don’t want to do that job so your criteria for acceptance is relatively low. See post office or other public-facing gov work.

    Edit: Huge shoutout to the woman at the DMV the last time I had to go who was the nicest person I’ve ever interacted with in any situatiin as a customer, not just at the DMV.

        • Dinodicchellathicc@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          They don’t deserve my appreciation because they haven’t earned it. They have my respect because I understand the job sucks and I’d never go out of my way to make things difficult for them. Then again when they get pissed off that i happen to exist, I start to resent them, and that’s fair.

  • Captain Janeway@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    The people who work there are generally nice. The DMV - however - is a beauracratic nightmare. It’s simply over complicated. Why must I register my car? A license and insruance should be all I need. I don’t register my shoes. I don’t register my computers. A car is no different. I understand having an authority which says “I own this vehicle”. But registering every year is basically just a waste of paper.

    Why do we now need 2 forms proving residency to get a star on an ID in order to fly between states? Should the homeless not be allowed to fly?

    Why do I need to fill out so much of it in person? I did everything I could online, but still they required me to pick up a packet of forms. Plus I had to retake my driver’s license test despite owning a valid license in my state. At this point, they should be able to - at least - fill out everything online. Hell, I should never have to go in person except in the case of taking a photo (which arguably is kind of dumb, but I can understand the security reasons for it).

    The DMV has convoluted forms, much like taxes. Filling out their forms should be idiot proof. But I - an idiot - have made mistakes on multiple occasions.

    After all the forms and all the verification, human error still makes it a crapshoot. Believe it or not, I had my birthday entered incorrectly on a license. I owned a valid driver’s license which lied about my month, day, and year of birth. At what point do we not just ask ourselves: what are we doing here?

    And I have to pay for my license? That’s absurd. In many cases, licenses are required by the government. How many times have you heard an officer demand a license despite a person not driving a car at the time? If a cop demands it as proof of my ID, then the government should provide it free (what else are taxes for?) Not to mention the fact that voting laws are starting to come up requiring a license. A license which you can only get if you pass a test, have a proof of residence, and have cash to afford it. I am very against disenfranchising the homeless (or anyone who meets that criteria) from voting.

    The DMV is just what most poorly funded and poorly designed government entities end up becoming: a barrier for access to things that should be easy to access.

    I’ve traveled all over the world and seen many systems. I’ve lived in many states. America is king of the poorly designed system.

    • DeadNinja@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      “…Why must I register my car? A license and insruance should be all I need. I don’t register my shoes. I don’t register my computers. A car is no different…”

      You have a very legit question, and I too thought about this.

      And I think the reason is just the same as registering your firearms - because in the end your car is a 4,000 lb killing machine.

      Everything else you mentioned - I agree 100%

        • evilgiraffe666@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          In the UK you have to tell the DVLA when you sell or buy a car so they can keep ownership records - this is useful because when you get caught speeding by a camera (for example) the owner is legally responsible and can be found. This doesn’t need annual updates, though we pay car tax annually so we’re unlikely to forget to update the DVLA if for example you move house.

      • scytale@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Another reason I think is the safety inspection, since you generally don’t want non-road worthy cars going 60mph. And yes, I know some states don’t require inspections.

      • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        And I think the reason is just the same as registering your firearms

        Firearms are only registered in a small handful of states. The overwhelming majority of the nation’s 700 million guns are not subject to any sort of registration requirements.

        FFL dealers are required to keep records (ATF 4473), but you don’t have to buy from an FFL dealer, and private transfers are not subject to registration either.

      • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        What? Where the hell do you need to register your firearms and where do you get the idea that registering a car is for safety? The reason you have to register your car is because that is the tax you are paying to support the public infrastructure that you are driving on. It has nothing to do with safety. And also the unholy alliance of private insurance and the legal requirement to pay a private entity.

    • derf82@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Your car travels almost exclusively on very expensive public roads and highways. License fees are used to help fund those roads. Many states have provisions to allow unlicensed vehicles on private property.

      Also, cars in poor operating condition are dangerous and polluting. Many states have some combination of safety and/or emissions inspections as part of licensing.

      Many states, especially where there are photo ID requirements, so offer free photo IDs. And pretty well every form I’ve filled out has been no more than a page in my state.

    • Sanctus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Accessibility for everyone should be a primary concern of the government, wether it be state or federal. You are spot on with creating barriers of entry. They don’t want the homeless or extremely impoverished voting. Otherwise why would it be so complex? It has no true need to be. Any system made up by humans that is so convoluted even the employees have issues is designed to create barriers not enable access.

      • DeadNinja@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        “…Accessibility for everyone should be a primary concern of the government…”

        Totally agree.

        But I also think that there is no reason to assume that the Government has any incentive whatsoever to care for people’s welfare.

  • Today@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 year ago

    Several years ago there was a story about a very successful ice cream maker who believed that schools should be run like businesses in order to be successful. He was asked what he does when he gets a bad batch of blueberries and he replied that he sends them back. Public schools, DMV, social security office, etc. don’t get to choose their blueberries - for better or worse they work with whatever comes through the door. Most of us are pretty socially insulated. DMV pops the bubble. I think that would be a stressful job.

    • CmdrShepard@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I never understood this mindset. Why would you want things like schools or the DMV to give customers the worst quality product at the highest price possible like a business would?

  • scubbo@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    I reject the premise. I’ve had three interactions with the DMV in-person, and all three were smooth and pleasant.

    Their website was irredeemably broken (and poorly-designed even if it had worked as intended), but that’s a different story…

    • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Indeed. Though, I’m lucky to have options on which DMV I visit, and I always choose the less travelled option, less waiting and the techs are much nicer.

  • FearfulSalad@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Post office too. Really any government office where the public is allowed inside.

    Underpaid workers trying to explain bureaucratic minutiae (for which they are not responsible) every single day to people who are not versed in that minutiae, do not want to learn it, cannot learn it, and are preemptively frustrated that they have to have this interaction in the first place. There is no winning–mental health isn’t cheap, do the workers’ resilience only lasts for so many years/months/days before they default to hating the clients, and the clients don’t trust publicly available instructions, thus dooming themselves to the shitty interactions.

    The only way to fix this is to take both people out of the equation–preprocess everything that might need to happen for everyone, to the point of turning every transaction into a single trasaction. That requires for every city, county, state, national, international agency to federate, so that you never have to file multiple documents to do a thing.

  • !ozoned@lemmy.world@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 year ago

    Mother-in-law works at one. Under educated, under paid, not enough help, everyone is forced to go there and sees it as a watse of their time so the “guv’ment” can “steal” your hard earned money. At least in thd US.

        • robotrash@lemmy.robotra.sh
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          This is a person that blames the workers for the poor working environment that is public facing government jobs. I think there are some other safe assumptions to make…

        • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Y’all don’t have a road tree? It’s right next to the money tree. And they’re both dead, cause no one remembered to water them.

        • Dinodicchellathicc@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          My state has some of the highest taxes and the second worst roads in the country. The roads should be better for the money i pay in taxes.

          But really I’m talking about wasted tax money. We all know the military blows money for fun with money we could’ve used to build an American autobahn.

  • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    In a word: underfunding. There are just far too few branches with far too few employees to effectively serve far too many people who don’t have the option of getting it done anywhere else.

    This leads to long lines and angrily impatient clients, which is so stressful in the long run as to crush the spirits of even the most cheerily helpful and dedicated public servant.

    All of it could EASILY be fixed by building more locations, expanding open hours, hiring more staff and letting people do some of the things themselves online, but politicians would rather spend your tax dollars on tax breaks for the rich and corporations.

    • RGB3x3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      The REAL solution is to build robust public transit so that a decent amount of people don’t even need to own a car and therefore don’t need to worry about going to the DMV.

      But like you said, the rich and the corporations come first.

      • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Except for the fact that, in spite of the name, the DMV isn’t just about motor vehicles. It’s also the main source for getting government ID, which is necessary for many things including, in some states hit particularly hard by right wing demagoguery, exercising your right to vote.

  • Dubious_Fart@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I dont want to run counter to the theme, but I’ve never had a problem with the DMV.

    My DMV lets you make appointments though, so maybe thats why. Never gone in without an appointment.

    • perishthethought@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      This. I’m sorry y’al dislike your DMV so much. Mine rules. I’ve never spent more than 15 minutes in their office (each time). The people are friendly and know their stuff, too.

  • nromdotcom@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    DMVs are sometimes where states will dump troublesome or underperforming employees they can’t outright fire.

    On the other end, the DMV is one of the places where employees have a job interacting with the public for sometimes-complex transactions. And, generally speaking, the public is dumb, unpleasant, and unprepared. Especially when dealing with low-level government beaurocrats who are telling them something they don’t want to hear.

  • MONKEYHOG@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    I dont agree with that at all. I guess it depends on what DMV you go to. I also have nothing against the post office.

  • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    The why is by design. Politicians in the US’s first past the post voting system are there to enrich themselves. They enrich themselves by making sure that the people who paid for their campaign are getting the appropriate tax structure and subsidies they paid for. Because state level budgets are finite, anything that does not advance the goal of the donor’s is optional. In addition think tanks such as the heritage foundation, or the third way, or hundreds of others that are the same with different names, are on a mission to make sure that government is privatized. It’s a slow multi-decade process, but the post office, the TSA, security clearances etc etc are examples of their success.

    It’s very easy to make government agency’s efficient, but making an efficient government means that a middleman doesn’t get paid, and thus in our hellish system, an efficient government cannot exist.

  • Subverb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    In my city I avoid the ones like this. I found one where they’re super nice and cooperative and laugh and make it a pleasant experience. Now I drive past two shitty tag agencies to go to the pleasant one. Totally worth it.

  • markr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    My DMV has always been staffed adequately by helpful people who do their job well. YMMV.

    AFAIC the op is an example of neoliberal propaganda.