• aseriesoftubes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    How long until the right starts saying that Obama killed the guy because he knew too much?

    Edit: Oops, some Lemmygrad fella in this very thread already did it. It’s always funny when people go so far left they loop over to the far right.

      • freagle@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        Fucking shit you liberals are stupid. Killing people is what power structures do. It’s not a reason to dislike the Obamas. It’s not like they personally killed the man. You don’t need a tin foil hat to be suspicious of uncommon deaths that happen around some of the most powerful people in the world.

        • Dr. Jenkem@lemmy.blugatch.tube
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Not a liberal bud.

          Killing people is what power structures do.

          Yeah, no shit, that’s what the police, military, and judicial system exist for, state sponsored executions. But if you want me to believe that Obama is personally putting hits out on his sous chef, I’m gonna need some evidence.

          • freagle@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            I never said that. You interpreted it. What I said was that I suspect foul play. That could be for any reasons, the most obvious being this guy was a liability to someone important, whether deliberately (he’s a spy) or accidentally (he saw something he shouldn’t have).

            • Dr. Jenkem@lemmy.blugatch.tube
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              These rich and powerful fucks do all sorts of evil shit right in the open, for all of us to see. They don’t need to be killing chefs to keep things quiet. They go on national tv and brag about their fucked up “accomplishments”.

              Occam’s razor says the dude was either drunk or a bad swimmer or both.

              • freagle@lemmygrad.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                10
                ·
                1 year ago

                Occam’s Razor is lazy. The simple explanation is that he had a standard paddle boarding accident. The incident rate for those accidents is significantly low. This complicates the use of Occam’s Razor. The person was well connected, in a very well connected space. They had access to better equipment, better waters, more safety equipment, better emergency services, etc, etc, etc. This complicates Occam’s Razor. The person was very close to powerful people in a long and continuous history of murders of convenience. This complicates Occam’s Razor.

            • loathsome dongeater@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              If you are wondering that you must have a killer or motive in mind. The reason I asked is that I don’t see any reason a chef would be needed to be killed like this.