Of course not.

“He was later given the nickname “The Teflon Don” after three high-profile trials in the 1980s resulted in acquittals …”

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Gotti

The original Teflon Don was John Gotti.

He died in jail.

He helped out with Withnail & I too.

I’m not sure if it’s what you’re looking for but I use Infuse on the ATV for the times the Plex client can’t play a file, usually because it’s DV format.

Neither of those things are true.

Do I need to ELI5 for you?

Yes please. Spell it out, why would I be a witness and why would an incomplete recollection of me being seven years old, several decades ago result in me being called to testify?

You aren’t making sense.

Of course. I hope you’re in a good place now.

How so? If you have a point to make here, please go right ahead.

I don’t follow?

Blocking you now. Your approach to this discussion has been embarrassing.

I’m sorry to hear that. Surely you can accept that everybody is different and that may not be the case for someone else?

It isn’t an honest answer.

This is the level you’re stooping to? I think you need to reevaluate your approach to this.

It could mean “I have 99% confidence something traumatic did happen to me.” It also could mean “I have 1% confidence something traumatic did happen to me.”

It could mean that, as I originally said, “I don’t have many memories from that age and none I would be 100% confident about in their accuracy.”

That’s the truth. You may not like it but that’s not my problem.

Anyway, I sense you’re pulling on this thread for all it’s worth to avoid discussing literally everything else I’ve brought up. Let’s leave it there. It’s like talking to a brick wall.

No, it’s an honest answer, you just don’t like it.

I answered as best as I could. What do you want me to say?

Notice I’ve supplied you with plenty of information from people who are far, far more familiar with this matter than you or I.

It speaks volumes that you’re completely unwilling to engage with it.

“On August 17, 1992, the Connecticut State Police announced that they were investigating the molestation allegation. In September the police referred Dylan to the Child Sexual Abuse Clinic of Yale New Haven Hospital. The main questions were whether Dylan was telling the truth and whether she was sexually abused. Frank Maco, State’s Attorney for the Litchfield district, declared in 1997 that he asked the Child Sexual Abuse Clinic to evaluate whether Dylan would make a viable witness. The clinic’s professionals met with the police and Maco for preliminary information. Between September 18 and November 13 they conducted nine separate interviews with Dylan and her mother. On October 14 they interviewed Groteke, and between November 17 and January 7 they had three interviews with Allen. Finally, they met with Farrow to review the recording she had made of Dylan between August 5 and 6. Berge, the other nanny present on August 4, was also interviewed, as were the two psychotherapists treating the children, Coates and Nancy Schultz. The Child Sexual Abuse Clinic medical director, Dr. John M. Leventhal, signed the team’s report while Dylan was interviewed by the social workers. Completed in March 1993, the report concluded: “It is our expert opinion that Dylan was not sexually abused by Mr. Allen.””

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Woody_Allen_sexual_abuse_allegation

You’re still refusing to answer a simple question. More to the point, what on earth gives you the confidence to pass judgement from a distance when your judgement is 100% at odds with experts who were directly involved in the case?

Again, maybe believe her.

You piss off the wrong person, they go to the police with a story that you committed a violent sexual assault against them. You didn’t.

By your logic, you’re a rapist.

See how stupid that is?

What sort of thing on that level of trauma happened to you when you were 7?

Like I said, I don’t have many memories from that age and none I would be 100% confident about in their accuracy.

Maybe believe victims.

Good grief, no. Take victims seriously, give them support, get their story, investigate, absolutely. Believe everything everybody says who identifies as a victim? That’s asinine.

Scroll up, you didn’t answer my question. You’re choosing to believe something based on what evidence? Please explain why you’re certain when the people who actually investigated these allegations are not.

She was 7. I know I don’t have many memories from that age I can be 100% confident about.

The simple fact is that neither of us know for sure what, if anything, happened. That’s why I find it curious when people jump to the “he’s 100% guilty” point of view.

“During the investigation the Connecticut State Police referred Dylan to the Child Sexual Abuse Clinic of Yale–New Haven Hospital, which concluded that Allen had not sexually abused Dylan and the allegation was probably coached or influenced by Mia Farrow. The New York Department of Social Services found “no credible evidence” to support the allegation.”

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Woody_Allen_sexual_abuse_allegation

I won’t watch a Woody Allen film anymore. I won’t watch the work of a pedophile.

I already had one Lemming absolutely lose their shit when I challenged them on this assumption, I hope you won’t be another one. Do you have any evidence to back up your claim?

Reddit uses fingerprinting techniques to track you across accounts

If this is true, they’re doing a terrible job at it. For my sins, I help moderate a small sub for the city I live in. I’m 99% sure there are one or two right wing assholes with multiple accounts but I can’t prove it.